23 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew 996 Body Kit
Leading reported evidence
Use though
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'd like to know how it test in a wind tunnel for track use though.
Leading evidence: 'Use though' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use though' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
23 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/960x467/996bodykit_7e6116783393617e92f02828313b5607ff7ad83d.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/960x467/996bodykit2_7a515a1bd87c1862115dac3532e075cd00e37bf0.jpg
I really like the RWB look - this sits 'okay' with me... For a drive around car - it's kind of cool. For what I need it to do - not so much. I do like the splitter though.
Mixed feelings.
I agree not something I would do for a street car but it is one of the "cleaner looking" kits that I've seen.
I'd like to know how it test in a wind tunnel for track use though.
Overall I like it, but there are a few lines that I'm not a big fan of. I don't like the flow of the side skirts, and the front bumper vents are about 10% too small.
Amazing. Any idea on the manufacturer of this kit?
There are certain angles that make the 996 look ungainly and this kit solves those issues. Notice how great the headlights look on this car?
]
