18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHShopping for a mid-00s 996...
Leading reported evidence
Use 996 body)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The 997 series began in 2005 (except the turbo which still used the 996 body).
Leading evidence: 'Use 996 body)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend 996 turbo: i agree very strongly' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The late 2005 through 2008 cars used the larger single row with a low failure rate.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The 997.1 generation also used the M96/M97 engines with the IMS roller bearing.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The 2005s used the smaller single row which was more problematic.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
: Adding this comment after seeing other posts recommending the 996 Turbo: I agree very strongly with the 996 Turbo as well.
Replace frequency, coils & plugs, injector health, clutch life
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Look for the history of maintenance on things like water pump, AOS, oil change frequency, coils & plugs, injector health, clutch life, running temp, and synchro health.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Look for the history of maintenance on things like water pump, AOS, oil change frequency, coils & plugs, injector health, clutch life, running temp, and synchro health.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In fact, I'd be using high miles to keep the prices right with all of the above (with good records and PPI), and to make it easy to keep piling miles on.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T061840Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Was looking at a new Cayenne or Macan, but decided that I really enjoy my 06 Cayenne Turbo (90K mi.) and it's in great condition, so why sell it. I've shifted to looking for a nice 996 and keeping the 955 as the kayak/bike/ski/mutt hauler. I'd really appreciate advice on the common issues to look out for on 06 or later 996s. I believe the IMS curse was cleared by 06...right? Any negatives on a Carrera 4 AWD? Thanks. Also looking for a Porsche indie tech in Bend OR.
The 997 series began in 2005 (except the turbo which still used the 996 body). The 997.1 generation also used the M96/M97 engines with the IMS roller bearing. The 2005s used the smaller single row which was more problematic. The late 2005 through 2008 cars used the larger single row with a low failure rate. The only issue with those is you cannot replace the bearings without disassemblling the engine. The 996 and 997 911s are similar but different. The obvious visual difference is the headlights . The 997s tend to be about 10k more expensive for similar condition cars.
The C4S and targa were offered for sale as a 2005 model 996 in the US. I've also seen a thread that details a small number of 996 C2 cars offered as 2005 models. It was a bit of a 'tweener year in the switch from 996 to 997.
The 997 forum will be a great resource for FAQs on the 2005-2008 Carreras. IMS concerns are less pronounced on 997s relative to 996s, so the approach to maintenance and risk is a little different. Look for the history of maintenance on things like water pump, AOS, oil change frequency, coils & plugs, injector health, clutch life, running temp, and synchro health. Work your way backward by flagging the common, expensive repairs and figuring out which ones are more likely to fall on the new owner. Good luck
It would probably be more effective for you to specify a price range and what you are looking for in a 996/997, rather than specifying model years. If you indicate price and priorities, you will probably get some useful feedback.
Not as unobtanium as you might think!
(just looks a little different) ->
https://roadscholars.com/inventory/1...a-2-cabriolet/
Thanks...I'm looking in the $40K +/- range, under 50K miles, Tip, Cabriolet, unmodified. I'm not familiar with other factory options or what else is good or to be voided. Cross-posting to the 997 forum too.
Tip, cab, unmodified should be easy to find a good deal on. Well, at least would be in my area of the country. 6 speed coupes seem to be in more demand and carry a higher price tag.
second the 996TT, no IMS, AWD and extraordinary power. outside of the GT cars, the only 996 to own is the Turbo. would even take it over a 997.1 base or S
For that budget and your prior concerns about IMS, I would recommend a 997.2 (2009 or newer) because the 2009 997.2 eliminated the IMS altogether. There's a pretty big price gap for the 997.2's for that reason, but still you should be able to find one in that budget. Normally I think 996's drive better than 997's (just because of weight), but in a Tip, I would guess the later Tiptronic in the 997's is better than the 996. I did not like the Tip in my prior 996.1 Carrera 4. The redesigned Tip in the 996.2 drives better than the 996.1. I'm assuming Tip is better still in the 997, but again I don't have any direct experience with it (hopefully somebody who has driven 996/997 Tips can chime in).
EDIT
: Adding this comment after seeing other posts recommending the 996 Turbo: I agree very strongly with the 996 Turbo as well. The Turbo would also be the best "investment". It's hotly debated whether 996's/7's will go up in value in the long-term, but I do think 996 Turbos are very likely go up in value in the future (though less so with a Tip versus a 6-speed)
996 Turbo's have already gone up in value, going to need >$50k to get one with <50k miles. For $40k you'll be in the 80-100k mile range. Nothing wrong with that, they're stout cars.
EDIT: I failed to see that you're looking for a Tip Cab. Those are the least expensive Turbo's on the market so you may be able to find one in the $40k range.
For what you want to spend, I'd look for a 996 Carrera 4S Cabriolet or 997.1—or maybe even 997.2 Carrera Cabriolet if you can find a deal. Or a high miles 996 Turbo Cabrio Tip. In fact, I'd be using high miles to keep the prices right with all of the above (with good records and PPI), and to make it easy to keep piling miles on. The coolest Porsches have high miles...
All of the 911s contemplated here are great cars. Some come with more risks than others...as in, the 996 and early 997 have the (overblown but nonetheless real if it bites you) IMS and other engine issues, while the more complicated cars have more...complication. But you are familiar with the latter with your CT. Then again, I have a real soft spot for the earliest 996s. Yep, the 3.4 coupes and cabs. They just drive sweetly...
Happy hunting!
996TT's do have an IMS, it's just a different style that is not susceptible to failure like ball bearing units used in the M96 engine. You probably meant that, but it is a distinction worth noting. Especially when trying to educate someone new to the topic.
