30 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHUpdate on 996 at BMW dealership
Leading reported evidence
Use car dealers
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Oh, also, don't underestimate those used car dealers.
Leading evidence: 'Use car dealers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run away' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Use gives slightly different data than the above link
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The decoder I use gives slightly different data than the above link.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Looks like Manheim New England does not yet have their Pre-sale run list published for next Thursday, March 10th.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
30 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
No they are being upfront about it saying engine is damaged. Who knows though some knuckle head who doesn't understand 996 motors may take a chance on it. I think the scariest scenario would be someone buys it and flips it to an unsuspecting buyer. It is running fine at the moment.
Don't suppose there is anyway we you can get the VIN from it? I think it should be spread far and wide so that any potential future buyers know it's history and can hopefully avoid being burned if it isn't repaired correctly (which I doubt it will be, especially if they get their reserve).
Looks like Manheim New England does not yet have their Pre-sale run list published for next Thursday, March 10th. I'll keep an eye on it and post what I find out. It will show VIN on the auction listing.
Oh, also, don't underestimate those used car dealers. They may not look like geniuses, but they know cars and the market. The knuckleheads don't last long in the business. The BMW dealer got screwed because it was lazy and the employees don't give a crap (except, maybe the used car manager). But, the small lot guys aren't going to be that way because it's their own money.
LOL. This is from the series of "Car runs fantastic, but overheats after 5 minutes. Could be something minor, but I am not a mechanic and don't have time to investigate" & "Car drives strong and runs fantastic, great interior. One little issues is that reverse gear is out. Would make for a great car for someone who drives a lot on the freeway or someone who doesn't need to use reverse to park."
Wow that brings up memories
I remember those boys from their first support gig in the USA, opening for Ozzy at Pine ****.
We were completely blown away when they started to play and a great bunch of kids to be on tour with. Rick is a great guy.
Does anyone have more details about this auction/ where to follow the results? I assume if it is a Meineke auction that it will not be open to the general public?
WP0CA299X4S650844
I am certain this is the car. Blue over tan 2004 C4S, 53k miles, cab, 6 speed, for sale by a BMW dealership at Manheim New England on Tuesday, 3/8/16. Interestingly, there is no Condition Report for the car, which would give the car a number grade for condition and would disclose the engine problem. most cars have them for benefit of Internet bidders. Also, I see no announcements listed for the car, which is the other place you would note the engine problem.
The decoder I use gives slightly different data than the above link.
2004 Porsche Carrera C4S Cabriolet
Division: PCNA
Commission #: 504963
Prod Month: 10/2003
VIN:
WP0CA299X4S650844
Price: $106,570.00
Exterior: Midnight Blue Metallic
Interior: Savanna Beige Full Leather
Warranty Start: March 08, 2004
Additional Equipment
342 Heated Front Seats
446 Wheel Caps with Colored Crest
513 Lumbar Support-Right Seat
586 Lumbar Support-Left Seat
680 Bose High End Sound Package
692 Remote CD Changer (6 Disc)
750 Delete Cabriolet Hardtop
E72 Dark Wood Interior Package
E9 Midnight Blue Metallic
M6S Savanna Beige Floor Mats
P16 Porsche Communication Mgt. II
P74 Xenon Headlamp Package
SD Savanna Beige Full Leather
V4 Metropol Blue Top
XSC Porsche Crest in Headrest
Y08 Brake/Shifter Dk Wood/Aluminum
Issue ID Failed Affected Component Miles City/State VIN Pattern
827100 02/10/10 ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING 29000 PEBBLE BEACH, CA WP0CA299X4S
924080 11/06/12 VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL 57000 BLUE RIDGE SUMMIT, PA WP0CA299X4S
924081 11/06/12 AIR BAGS 57000 BLUE RIDGE SUMMIT, PA WP0CA299X4S
Hi guys, I am new to this forum, and new to the search for a Porsche. I have dreamed of owning one for longer than I care to admit, and with the last child out of college last week, I am finally in a position to start my search. My question to you all is this: I came across the car mentioned in this thread on Car Gurus, and with the VIN search came up with this thread. I see that it started 2 years ago, is there any update to the motor problems mentioned here? I haven't been able to come up with any updates. Aside from the mention of the interior choices, is there anything else you have come up with in your search? Thanks in advance!
Interesting. What is the current mileage? If it is still around 53k, that would be a huge flag that it still has major issues. It's possible someone did the necessary work in the past two years to adress the issues, but I would be very leery.
I googled the VIN because my curiosity got the best of me. I see a dealer in NY has it and it only has 3k miles more than it did 2 years ago. There is no detail about the condition of the car on their web site. They are also asking 31k, so it is no bargain. Run away from this one.
The ad states mileage is 56,701 miles. The carfax is available for it, but it isn't free. Before I start looking deeper into it I wanted to get as much info as is currently available from those who know more about its past.
No one knows...Run Forrest, run!
Carfax is not an expensive tool to have, it can give you a general idea of service history and potential issues, but it's not 100% accurate.
What do you mean by "leads"? Are you looking for help finding a similar car to the one in question? If so, what exactly are your wants? I've helped find a couple others their cars but can't find my own...yet!
Yes, I am looking for a car similar in year and features to the one mentioned in this thread. Definitely a Cab, and ideally I would like the C4 S features, but the "S" part isn't a must. Thanks!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
