27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHthese guys are nuts!
Reported or suspected cause
964 based c4
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
Well to be 100% accurate it was the 964 based C4 that was based on the 959 not our 996 cars.
Leading evidence: '964 based c4' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is '964 based c4' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace of underwear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ezum4...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9njF...eature=related
an oldie but still fresh:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHqMZ...eature=related
It boggles my mind to see cup cars on dirt roads and in the snow...
I would be interested to see how a well prepared C4 (with Blizzaks) would fare in those conditions against the more powerful, but lacking traction GT3.
Well to be 100% accurate it was the 964 based C4 that was based on the 959 not our 996 cars. When I say based it was the AWD drivetrain.]
Oh, and yeah these videos rock!
THESE GUYS ARE NUTS!!!! Does that pertain to the drivers? Or the spectators on the sidelines???? Unreal...not sure I'd get so close on the turns there!!
J
That in-car is good. Jammin' it into 1st on the hairpins, and then waving at the crowd.
I watched a couple sections of the Monte Carlo many years ago in Germany, fun stuff.
they drive in the upper RPM range so they have power on tap. This kind of driving is very agressive, as fast as the RPM rises, the RPM drops just as fast... Im sure they set up that shift light bellow redline for safety of grenading the engine.
