8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGIAC Chip Flash/Evo intake installed today
Leading reported evidence
Replace trashed kumhos
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I also went to Tireworks (they give great discounts to PCNA members and put on a set of Goodyear F1 GS-D3 to replace my trashed Kumhos.
Leading evidence: 'Replace trashed kumhos' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace trashed kumhos' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Thanks for the input...I shall find out whether their dyno test improvements
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello all
Just got my 2001 996 Cab out of storage today and had to try for some more HP this year. I had the work done at Pfaff Tuning (Toronto) and, as usual, all went very well. I also went to Tireworks (they give great discounts to PCNA members and put on a set of Goodyear F1 GS-D3 to replace my trashed Kumhos.
What did I notice? Intake noise is louder, especially over 4k RPM. Seat of pants says faster and judging from acceleration in higher gears, torque has improved as well as HP.
My first track day is at Shannonville on Wed May 3. I know the track well (6th season for this car) and will be able to report improvement more accurately based on shift points etc.
Will post next week. Great to start another season with something different!
Cheers
Ian
No, I did not. I relied on published GIAC/EVO dyno data which has been reproduced on this forum many times. As you know, seat of pants doesn't mean all that much, however, I'll be able to tell based on track day next week. As I mentioned, I have a lot of seat time in my car at this track and I know the shift points very well. I'll be able to tell the difference (if any) very quickly and will report back to all.
As an aside, I've been told that the 3.4 L engine is more suited to chip flashing than the 3.6...don't know if that's true.
that's a drag.....at least you have the torque and HP of a 997S to fall back on!
Thanks for the input...I shall find out whether their dyno test improvements
http://www.evoms.com/996%20tuning.htm
are truth or fiction next Wednesday.
Cheers
Ian
I can't tell you yet as I drove car from tire shop through the usual disgusting Toronto traffic to garage. One exit ramp taken at speed and turn in felt great. Unfortunately, basis of comparison was a set of absolutely trashed Kumho's....will fill you in on tires after track day next week. I was considering the new Bridgestone Pole Positions and the Yoko Advan Neo, however, both are not available in Canada yet.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
