Rennlist

RLandis - Where are the PICS?????

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHRLandis - Where are the PICS?????

Leading reported evidence

Run across a post

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
BTW Richard, I was looking at some older threads about side skirts and ran across a post that you were interested in them also.
Original post Read captured discussion
RLandis - Where are the PICS?????

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run across a post' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run across a post' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run across a post

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
BTW Richard, I was looking at some older threads about side skirts and ran across a post that you were interested in them also.
Original post Read captured discussion
RLandis - Where are the PICS?????

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link
That was a good try on the diversionary tact of posting pics of your beautiful wife and her new car, but it didn't work!
Original post Read captured discussion
No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Richard - I, for one, am still waiting to see the pics of your car. That was a good try on the diversionary tact of posting pics of your beautiful wife and her new car, but it didn't work! Dell - care to add anything to help "induce" Richard to post pics? BTW Richard, I was looking at some older threads about side skirts and ran across a post that you were interested in them also. Did you ever get any side skirts?

POST 2Original post

Richard. POST DEM DAMN PICS OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES!!! I'll call Barkley direct and give her the web address to this forum

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Oh oh, Richard, now you are REALLY between the proverbial "rock and a hard place!" (hee hee)

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Richard, I will keep bumping this thread to get it back up near the top of the list! Bump!

POST 5Original post

OK Lads, one at a time....as far as the skirts, I was talked out of them by a few members here, as the skirts for the C4S are model specific, and wind-tunnel tested.... as far as the pix, everything save ONE LOUSY WHEEL is in, and as soon as the wheel is here, I'll phtograph, and display....it should be early next week. Adios,

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Richard - Just take pics of the side of the car with two good wheels! Yeah, I know you don't have any of them mounted yet, but is was still fun bustin' your chops!

POST 7Original post

Ok Tim, maybe it's time to back off of Richard for a bit. I am sure he is exhausted from all the "thank you's" he had coming to him after that 6-series CAB surprise!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.