4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHJIC CROSS Coilovers installed.
Leading reported evidence
Install but needs more negative camber
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I already have the PSS-9 installed but needs more negative camber.
Leading evidence: 'Install but needs more negative camber' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install but needs more negative camber' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have these installed on my car. I have no pictures of installation, but can post some before/after shots. While I don't have a whole lot to compare too, all I can say is that they transform your car, in a positive way. I should also mention that the car looks so much better lower. What's difficult for me, is that I made so many changes at once, I cannot tell which ones are making the greatest impact. I went from 17 winters to 18" SO2a's, stock suspension and sways to JIC cross and gt3 sways, all at the same time.
That said, when I am not riding over NYC pot holes, I absolutely love the car and the new suspension. I got the softest spring setting and have the rebound set in the middle. I have done absolutely nothing in terms of playing with and tweaking it, so the pot hole issue might very well be alleviated by softening the rebound. On the highway, the car is as tight and nimble as I would like it. There is absolutely no body roll and the porposing and mushy front that used to plagued my car is gone. Further, the under steer is gone and I just love it. I should note that the GT3's are set in the middle.
I have put about 2,500 miles on the car since install and did expect to have 3-4 days of track time by now. However, due to some family and personal issues, I have yet to visit the track. So, I don't have any track feedback, but I suspect that this is where the JIC's will truly excel. Being a little more aggressive some others, and being a little more sensitive to road conditions, a flat track with twists is really the JIC's play ground.
I should also mention that while my 996 is my only car, its really only used on the weekends (live in NY and commute over the Brooklyn Bridge!) and so I guess I cannot call it a true daily driver. That said, I have put about 14,000 miles on her since October.
One thing that people should be aware of for the JIC's is the height/length of rear suspension adjustment points. They are higher than stock, so you will need to cut or drill a bigger hole in the foam to get the carpet flush and stock looking. It's not a big deal, just an FYI.
Finally, I should mention that JIC "custom" tuned these for me. Not really sure what that means, but thats what they said. I assume it has to do with the valving. Further, while others in the auto community have had issues with JIC responsiveness, mine was nothing but positive as a wrong piece was sent with the original order and they overnighted the replacement part to my local shop! I should mention that Vivid might also have been responsible for the responsiveness of JIC.
I apologize for the rambling write up, at some point I will provide a more analytical and complete review.
Chris
For disclosure purposes, I purchased this unit from Vivid. They gave me a good price!
