20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLow Mile GT3 $49k
Leading reported evidence
Check on gt3 board
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check on gt3 board' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check on gt3 board' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Maybe that car has changed hands at an auction or something.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Mark- Other than the color...what a great buy!!! That looks like one of the better deals available. Now if I can convince my wife that this car would be a terrific after Xmas gift...
It's a GT3. Look at the intake in the engine compartment and the area where a C2 would have rear seats.
What made you say that the front trunk looked like a C4S?
Did cross checking on Gt3 board. This car has been wrecked and repainted.
Looked too good to be true...
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-gt2-...9-xxx-huh.html
Here is the Florida car that has "issues"
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-...1%7C240%3A1318
The car here is not the same one that has been discussed previously. It still might have it's own issues, but the ad clearly states the car has never been tracked.
Hi. ..I have a question..why is wrecked and repainted a reason to immediately reject a car? Many cars are involved in accidents and as long as the repairs were done properly it should be ok. A proper PPI and specificallyy looking for the repairs. I understand the Porsche world values the origional paint etc. but if this car was done correctly a 15-20,000 discount may still be a great deal. Wrecked may me a bumper cover.
Achillies, I agree 100%. I would not shy away from a car because it appears to be "too good to be true". I have bought several cars over the internet, that fell under that category. I would take it to a reputable dealer or independant for a PPI, prior to purchasing it, and make sure they examine it for past bodywork. I would consider it a plus, if the front end had a high quality repaint for cosmetic reasons (rock chips). The other (Florida) car that I just posted, I wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole...it just had a repair to the engine for a cracked block.....I don't remember that being disclosed when it was for sale a few months ago.
Unfortunately, Luxury Motors is far from ethical. I never cared for their sales staff, but was shocked to find out about their business practices. I learned about their business practices from a friend (of 10 years) who's been in the car business for the last 15 years - this friend started a JV with Luxury Motors in the suburbs of Chicago with the backing from a large, local dealer. He forced luxury motors out in the first 6 months of this JV because of their shady dealings. Most vehicles have seen severe damage AND they often lie about it - to the extent that they falsify paperwork (i.e. not disclosing salvaged titles).
I would advise all against purchasing vehicles from luxury motors - there's a reason their inventory is priced well below market...
I do not know Luxury Motors, but I was looking at a RED Gt3 in Ontario Canada earlier this year that was for sale at an independant dealer at a VERY low price. The dealer was forthright in telling me that the car was hit from behind. Maybe that car has changed hands at an auction or something.
Do a proper PPI and look for rear end damage.
