13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThe Value of a PPI
Leading reported evidence
Use oem body parts
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Said he used all OEM body parts on the conversion, not aftermarket, done to a very high standard.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The wife says "You are getting it inspected before you pay, right?" I told her that I thought I could skip it on this one, but she insisted, so I humored her.
Leading evidence: 'Use oem body parts' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect before you pay, right?" i told her' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The wife says "You are getting it inspected before you pay, right?" I told her that I thought I could skip it on this one, but she insisted, so I humored her.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The $115 PPI was money well spent and would recommend Fischer's wholeheartedly.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I told him no deal if he didn't take it to Fischer Motors (don't know them from Adam, I just found them highly recommended here on Rennlist).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
My gold, my rules - seller doesn't want to take it to a Rennlist recommended indy for the PPI, then no deal.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Inspect before you pay, right?" i told her
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The wife says "You are getting it inspected before you pay, right?" I told her that I thought I could skip it on this one, but she insisted, so I humored her.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've been shopping for a 996 for about 1 1/2 years now - at times more seriously than others. The only P-car in the garage currently is my son's 951 (which I steal for a quick drive from time to time). Love this 996 forum and have read it nearly every day during that time, but only post once in a blue moon since I don't own a 996 yet. Twice I've agreed to a price on out of town cars, but the deal fell apart at the PPI. Not expecting a perfect car, just one that's in reasonably good condition, which I've explained to the seller.
The first time, when I told the seller I wanted it taken to a certain indy mechanic for the PPI, the seller said that indy "had a horrible reputation" and refused to take it there. My gold, my rules - seller doesn't want to take it to a Rennlist recommended indy for the PPI, then no deal. A Rennlister local to the seller confirmed later that I didn't want that car.
Yesterday, nearly the same thing happened. Found a car in Chicago. It had some bodywork mods (Mk 2 conversion), so I figured it had been in an accident. Bought an Autocheck report that confirmed a previous front end collision, but with no frame damage so not a deal killer on an 80,000 mile, 14 year old car at a $16,500 sale price. Private seller, Ebay pics looked good, the description included the following phrases:
"I've had this car for a few years now, I know it inside and out, I guarantee you will not be disappointed, and you will not have to fix anything! We purchased a newer 997 and don't need this one anymore. Technical condition is perfect, runs and drives great, no problems. No noises from the engine or transmission, no leaks, no overheating, no gear slipping whatsoever. I've taken really good care of it".
Seller was responsive to e-mail messages, sent me a photo of the option codes sticker, photos from a clutch replacement supposedly done 3,000 miles ago (but with no IMS upgrade
). Said he used all OEM body parts on the conversion, not aftermarket, done to a very high standard. Everything's looking good at this point - apparent Porsche enthusiast owner selling his "precious" 996 because he bought a 997. I've bought several other European cars on the internet over the years without a PPI (including my 964 and my son's 951), and not had a problem always buying from private individuals who are responsive to questions. After agreeing to the price, I bought my airline tickets to Chicago for my wife and I to fly-out, drive home this Friday. The wife says "You are getting it inspected before you pay, right?" I told her that I thought I could skip it on this one, but she insisted, so I humored her. Boy, am I glad I did. I called to speak with the seller (all but one of the previous communications were via e-mail) about a scheduling issue, and he mentioned for the first time that although he was a perfectionist and most people wouldn't notice, there was a small paint issue with the left front fender. Hmmm. Well, I tell him let's run it by a local mechanic for an inspection - again, not expecting perfection here, just checking that it's in overall good shape. Please take it to Fischer Motors in Lake Barrington. Then the excuses start: too far away, use Motor Werks new Porsche dealer instead because they are much better, etc. Red flags are now flying. I told him no deal if he didn't take it to Fischer Motors (don't know them from Adam, I just found them highly recommended here on Rennlist). He grudgingly agrees.
I get a call from the seller right after he leaves Fischer's wanting to know immediately if I'm going to buy the car. I tell him I haven't heard from the inspector yet and I want to see the report. He tells me he doesn't want me to wait - he wants me to call Fischer's immediately to make up my mind immediately. I call Rick at Fischer's and he gives me a quick verbal report - basically, no way, not at any price. I get his written report about half an hour later. Highlights:
Metal Particulate in oil filter housing
Coolant leak at passenger side cover plate
Wheels/tires not correct fit/tires rub at rear suspension/inner fender covering/support
Tires dry cracked
Front and rear bumpers not secure/poor fit and finish
Left subframe at sway bar mount is cracked
Body damage found at left inner fender well
A/C line right side crushed
Right front strut mount noise
Left fender paintwork is cracking/separating
Center console hinge is broken
Sunvisors broken
Clutch pedal mechanism squeak
Passenger seat belt rattling noise
Driver's window seal bad
There were some other minor items as well. Yikes! After comparing notes and doing a little more research, my opinion is that the entire backstory on the car was an outright lie. Moral of the story -
don't skip the PPI
, even for a car that you're willing to accept a few warts on (e.g. - minor accident history). This car would've cost me a bundle to make right, assuming we'd have even made it home in one piece. The $115 PPI was money well spent and would recommend Fischer's wholeheartedly.
You should post the ebay link to that car for other RLers who might be looking at the car. I think another great point in buying a car that is not close to you is to always call the seller. Emails are easy to hide (minus you have a written record). First thing I did when I was interested in a car was call the seller. You can get a real quick vibe on the seller that way.
For all water cooled Porsche engines up until the 9A1 engine, I'd really recommend pulling the plugs and having a look at the cylinder walls as a part of any PPI done. Body, suspension and wear items are minor compared to the engine which is at least 13k.
Wow! Nice move.
I've been burned in the past without a PPI. Skipped it on the 996 and the only downside was more rock chips on the front than expected.
Very true, excellent advice.
As to the OP - I've bought and sold several cars with PPI. My rule has always been that the buyer picks the place, and as a seller I bend over backwards to accomodate them. It makes everyone feel better about the transaction.
There are plenty of 996s out there. Finding one that meets all of your criteria may take some time. As long as your price point isn't too low, you'll find one!
I remember seeing that ad too locally. I could've checked it out for you had I known you were intereseted. Hopefully you can get your airline tickets refunded.
Thanks for this insight as I have been tempted not to get one on cars I've looked at, so far havn't even made it to the PPI stage yet. Just getting a seller I feel good about is hard enough. They all 'seem' to be PCAR people until you ask questions.