fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

OT, but an important read.

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHOT, but an important read.

Leading reported evidence

Run web site too

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I run a web site too but it's far from the work they have to do.

Original post Read captured discussion
OT, but an important read.
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run web site too' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run web site too' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run web site too

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I run a web site too but it's far from the work they have to do.

Original post Read captured discussion
OT, but an important read.
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Taking some liberties here, but for those of you who do not frequent the OT Forum, these comments by John D. may put the scope of RENNLIST into perspective. Thanks J&J for all that you do! ABOUT RENNLIST

POST 2Original post

Thanks Don W and above all thanks John D. HEAR HEAR!!!

POST 3Original post

Good one Don for bringing this to attention. I think John and Jen are amazing people. I run a web site too but it's far from the work they have to do. Their commitment cannot be faltered. All I can say is I had barely posted 10 posts and signed up for two years and hopefully will continue to do so again in the future. I just don't understand the reckoning of some small mided people. They spend 50, 60, 100 large and even more and then they quible over a few bucks to get a fantastic forum like this. It doesn't take much thinking about. Personally I think John D and Jen should earn a squillion for there efforts. Here's to John D and Jen. Maybe one day I can buy em a pint in person.

POST 4Original post

Thank you for the reminder. Looking fwd to the decal (no rush). This board is awesome. Bill

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.