9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHappy Holidays
Leading reported evidence
Check none of this was
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I just checked - none of this was on page 1 or 2 of Tim's modification bible...
Leading evidence: 'Check none of this was' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check none of this was' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can't use the taco wing on your car because it would interfere with the operation of the soft top.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Let's see... I did get 1:18 scale model 997 RC car... Arctic Silver just like my 996 cab in the garage...
But the big present was the concession from the wife to get the pair of side rocker panels that go with the new bumper cover I'm getting (back in October or so, someone hit my car in the work parking lot hard enough to put a tear in the front bumper cover...) I'm getting the turbo bumper cover in addition to the side rockers and having all three pieces shot at the same time... hopefully by this time next month I'll have pictures of the face lift to show...
Happy holidays to you and everyone!
Rudy
-------------------------------------
'01 Arctic Silver/Black C2 Cabriolet
'03 Silver F-150 Supercrew
Tim,
Me too! Is what I'm doing called a "turbo conversion" (or does a "real" turbo conversion include engine mods?). I was going to solicit opinions on what I had in mind... not that it would change my mind, but to get an idea of what "conventional wisdom" thought... either way, I like the way a "stronger chin" looks and have lusted after the turbo bumper since I got her... and you simply must have the side skirts (or so my whining went...) Not sure about the turbo rear bumper cover (yes, your *** does look big in that...) and the wing... maybe something small and stylish, like the aero kit wings... but not sure about that either.
Happy holidays!
Rudy
-----------------------------------
'01 Arctic Silver/Black C2 Cabriolet
'03 Silver F-150 Supercrew
I guess that would be the "turbo look conversion." You may want to consider adding the turbo or C4S rear bumper cover. Of course that will have to be down the road a bit so you can practice your whining a little more.
Did you see Joaquin's post of the turbo bumper his friend did? You might want to flag that for future reference.
You can't use the taco wing on your car because it would interfere with the operation of the soft top. You will need to do something low to allow the top to operate unabated.
Some work in oils, other in water colors... I seemed to have discovered something of a new talent... aside from the rockers, that's what "expedited" the acquisition... but, like anything else, practice, practice, practice...
Yes I did see Joaquin's post on the bumper... beautiful... and maybe beyond me, I'll see what can be had without modification...
Good to know about the taco wing... I just checked - none of this was on page 1 or 2 of Tim's modification bible... did I skip ahead?
Rudy
----------------------------
'01 Arctic Silver/Black C2 Cabriolet
'03 Silver F-150 Supercrew
