10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHQ: for Rejex users
Leading reported evidence
Use wax more often
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Even though it is durable and gives a good shine, I like to rub Paulina's fenders, so I am using wax more often...
Leading evidence: 'Use wax more often' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test i did' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
On wheels, in a side by side test I did, it cause more brake dust to stick than on the wheel without rejex.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I bought a 16 oz bottle and didn't even use 1/5th of it for my whole car (and I must say it looks DAMN GOOD)!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can't use any silicone-based polishes before Rejex.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I've been using Klasse SG and S100 for quite some time, that's a tough act to follow.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Does the 16oz bottle do the whole car? I would assume so but wanted to hear from actual users.
Also has anyone used it and not been impressed with the results?
I bought a 16 oz bottle and didn't even use 1/5th of it for my whole car (and I must say it looks DAMN GOOD)!
Just my two cents.
P.S. If you are going to use it, don't forget the curing period (24 hours).
is this the one that is $17?
if so you should be able to do your car many many times. I use it for my wheels. I might give it shot on the whole car again once my PC pads arrive. I've been using Klasse SG and S100 for quite some time, that's a tough act to follow.
Nick,
Using Rejex might reduce the number of repeat customers you get in a given time period. It allegedy lasts for 6 months. Good for your customers but might not be good for your cash flow.
It is a little less shiny than wax. On wheels, in a side by side test I did, it cause more brake dust to stick than on the wheel without rejex. I tried it on the windshield as some advocated too, but it was scraped off by the blades and left lines of material at the end of the blades' travel. Having said that, it is very durable and I'll probably continue to use it on the lower surfaces of the car. I may even wax over it for a little more depth.
I've been using Rejex for about a year now, on three different cars. Rejex definitely lasts a bit longer than other waxes, IF you prepare the surface correctly. You can't use any silicone-based polishes before Rejex. Before Rejex, I did clay bar, then Meguiar's Gold Class Paint Cleaner, then Menzerna Final Polish II (great product -- removes surface scratches extremely well). You can also use 3M Imperial Glaze instead of Menzerna as it also has no silicones or fillers. Contrary to what others have said, Rejex doesn't give you a better shine. In fact, it has no polishes or cleaners. The only thing it does better is protect your car longer. One of my cars sits outside all the time, and that's the true test. Water does bead up a bit longer than with Meguia's waxes that I used to use.
One bottle should do at least 5 mid-sized cars.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
