7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWant to close wheel gap....
Leading reported evidence
Use complete kits
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For others looking for more aggressive handling or track use, complete kits then become appropriate.
Leading evidence: 'Use complete kits' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use complete kits' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
BTW - He was using H&R's, also reccomended Mo30's but told me to stay the hell away from Eibach's.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am looking to close the wheel gap on my 04 C2 with stock suspension. I would like to keep as much ride quality as I can. Can I just put in the RoW springs without the shocks and swaybars? Thanks in advance.....
I don't think it is advisable. I have always thought that springs and shocks are made to work together. The ROW doesn't drop it that much-20mm front and 10mm rear. The X74's will drop it 40mm front and 30mm rear. Mine dropped about 1 1/2 inches with the X74 set up.
Check out the info at carnewal.com Gert at Carnewal is extremely knowledgeable and great to deal with.
If you just install row springs for your model, you'll get the same ride quality as any other 996 built for all other countries in the world. A factory 996 ride quality. The difference in the US version springs is to raise the ride height.
I think you will need a different bumper stop for the fronts, the parts dept can look that up for the springs they order.
They should drop it 20mm front and 10mm rear. And it will be enough to be noticable and destinguish it from other 996s.
Its the way to go if you just want to lower the car a little and not affect the ride much and stay echonomical.
CLLACAB, do you have before and after pics with X74. I'm looking into it, but I'm concerned about my painted lip. Looking for some protection for my painted TT front before I change. From my research the X74 is the best. It's factory and is lower than ROW M030
This is my current stock.
Big6Dad
okbarnett is correct...H&R or MO30 springs are fine if you're looking to simply lower the car. Was just at the p-shop of the head of local POC group and he advised that the setup you are suggesting was exactly what most needed since the most common motivation for street drivers was strictly cosmetic.
For others looking for more aggressive handling or track use, complete kits then become appropriate.
BTW - He was using H&R's, also reccomended Mo30's but told me to stay the hell away from Eibach's.
Don,
I also posted a picture on the flat-6 board re: the discussion of the turbo bumper converison.
http://www.flat-6.net/forum/showthre...2&start=&pp=10
If you click on the attached thumbnails, the pictures should enlarge. You can see from the partial side view the gap is closed considerably. However, I did not paint my lip for the simple reason that I knew I was going to scrape it occasionally. And I do. Not badly, but it does happen. The Lapis Blue is dark enough that it is not that much of a color difference between the lip and the bumper.
I probably should have left the strip black as well, but on an AS car it looked ugly to me anyway, and the line from the bumper to the rockers wasn't the same.
I also looked for an alum. boomerang for the TT bumper but couldn't find one.
Ugly!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.