11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHExhaust Tips
Leading reported evidence
Check pca
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check pca' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check pca' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
When I did my research, I found a lot of information to a 3.4 using a 3.4 or 3.6 PSE.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
There has been a lot of debate on this, something to the fact that the 3.6 can't use the 3.4 PSE, though the 3.4 can use the 3.6 or 3.4 PSE.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
There has been a lot of debate on this, something to the fact that the 3.6 can't use the 3.4 PSE, though the 3.4 can use the 3.6 or 3.4 PSE.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T061123Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Quick question... will polished tips from a "00 C2 fit on the newer version of PSE? Paranoid me bought the PSE and now thinks I've read something about fitment of the tips. Or, does it just have to do with the bumper opening, not the actual tips? Installing this weekend/next week and just looking to make sure of no suprises.
Thanks!
I don't have PSE, but I don't see why it wouldn't fit. I assume you bought the 3.6 PSE? What year car do you have? The tips from +02 will not fit on a 99-01 rear bumper due to the shape of the exhaust cut-out. However, tips from 99-01 WILL fit an 02+ rear bumper, but it will look a little off. IMO
Thanks Tom. I'm waivering on the electronics right now. Part of me says just add it later, the other part of me says go ahead and do it now so that I can turn it off when it's early/late driving in the neighborhood or when I'm pulling onto a client site. Got a few days to make the decision. Install price is kinda steep, though- might just do it myself.
I concur. There has been a lot of debate on this, something to the fact that the 3.6 can't use the 3.4 PSE, though the 3.4 can use the 3.6 or 3.4 PSE. I can't remember what the adverse effects or benefits might be one way or the other. Back with the answer after I check PCA.
Edward- Please let me know what you find. When I did my research, I found a lot of information to a 3.4 using a 3.4 or 3.6 PSE. If that's not the case, I'm in trouble...
I don't think you are going to have any problems. I found the following posts on rennlist that might help you
here
and especially
here
.
You shouldn't have any troubles.
Good luck.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
