26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHnice 2002 lightweight OEM 18"s FS
Leading reported evidence
Use 2 hands and not just one
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Good thing Phil got there first otherwise my comment would have been about using 2 hands and not just one.
Leading evidence: 'Use 2 hands and not just one' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 2 hands and not just one' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Hi all,
I found these....no affiliation...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...ksid=p3907.m32
These went through last week with no bids...so they will probably sell for the minimum bid.
I was looking into them, but decided to go with 19"s instead...I thought this was a good deal for someone here.
I spoke with the seller last week....a lady selling them for her son....they were on his 928 and got hit in the side so the insurance co totalled it.
She seemed very nice...
good luck
I'm guessing that the seller is looking at something else when they quote the part# - they look like OEM wheels to me - you can even see the offsets next to the valve stalk.
At least the seller didn't say 90% tread.
I am sure it wouldn't bother you. Just like getting less than 24 months out of a Porsche battery didn't bother you!
Good evening, Phil! Yeah, I'm still here!
Tim, you're always lurking ....
BTW, the person that bought the lapis/gray C4S with 82K miles would have done better with your car. We all know how ****, er I mean meticulous, you are with it. GL with the sale!!
I knew one of you (Wayne or you) would catch the "hand" reference. I almost changed it, but what the hell, if you can't laugh at yourself, who can you laugh at?
You guys are on a roll this morning. Good thing Phil got there first otherwise my comment would have been about using 2 hands and not just one.
... you know just like Holberts does when Phil and I take our cars in there.
I can see their slogan now, "At Holberts, we don't blow smoke, we pound sand!"
Man, sometimes I even crack myself up! Oh, sorry.... I guess I shouldn't say "crack" around the two of you!
