23 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCheck out this thread on the 997 board
Leading reported evidence
Check other 3 posts of the guy
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check other 3 posts of the guy' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check other 3 posts of the guy' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
23 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
hope its a joke.... and the replies as well
first page was enough to go back to ebay. Is it possibly worse than the 993-996 or tip vs manual threads? Nah.
I decided to laugh! That's so funny! Prince Kalbi is from Seoul, Korea. Hmmm, I think I read about someone from Seoul, Korea earlier today - yes it was Ben! Must be a coincidence
The sister thread on the GT3 board.
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-gt3-forum/397513-serious-question-gt3-vs-turbo.html
They don't seem to have taken it quite so seriously....
I hooked my current wife driving a 1985 944 and a 2000 Tundra. I didn't get the 996 until after she said yes. She insisted I get it bacause she knew how much I loved P cars and she loves it (she named it Isebell...she names EVERYTHING, but that's another story
Hey Ben! I read you're looking at another car. What about that British Racing Green Astin Martin I saw in one of your earlier posts. That's an awesome car!!
