10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMoving to 996, seeking advice
Leading reported evidence
Check into it
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I know that Todd at Evo has SC'd a 3.6 Tip 'cause I was checking into it.
Leading evidence: 'Check into it' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check into it' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Check with your tuner but I was under the impression that to use a SC you need Egas (throttle by wire).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Check with your tuner but I was under the impression that to use a SC you need Egas (throttle by wire).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T003124Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello all,
Long time lurker on the forum... I'm in the middle of selling my 03 NSX and migrating over to the Porsche world. I plan on supercharging the 911 immediately and have already spoken to a local tuner about the evo SC.
I want to keep my budget for the car itself in the 45-55k range and was hoping to get some buying advice. I definitely want a coupe, definitely need a tip and would prefer a C2. I figure I'm going to be looking at a 1999-2000 model with my budget and was wondering if there are differences between these model years and if there is anything to look out for. Also, were there any big changes in 01? I know there was a redesign in 02, but 02 will be out of my range solidly since I definitely want to do aero kit, SC and headers. I'd love to find a Porsche certified one, but the chances of that seem slim.
Any shopping pointers would be most welcome!
Thanks!
Hello,
Find a car in a good condition regardless of MYs. If you read the forum you will realize that 99,00 arent any less reliable than 02-. There are plenty 99 models with zero problems. Good luck..
I'm somewhat similar to you, a lurker who's thinking of making the plunge, but will likely buy new.
Mind if I ask why you "definitely need a tip"? (My impression is that most people who buy P-cars, or those that are similarly sporty, come to regret the decision to not get a stick, even those with M3's who choose SMG.)
Yet, it seems to me that a disproportionate number of turbos have tips, and I find it maybe more than coincidental that you plan on supercharging and also want a tip. Is there something I don't know about that makes automatic transmissions relatively more appealing on turbo- or supercharged cars?
The tip is just a personal choice for me. Lots of factors make an auto more attractive for my lifestyle (wife, heavy NYC traffic, less worry in valet situations that I inevitably wind up in).
I've never found that an auto has detracted from my enjoyment of sports cars in the past, and I have owned a few others (Corvette, 2 NSX's) This really is a personal thing...
I want to SC because the main reason I am getting out of the NSX is that I find the power inadequate, to be honest. I'd LOVE to get a TT, but I haven't been able to find insurance for less than $8k per year here in Brooklyn
(33, married, home owner, defensive driving course, very good credit, spotless record)
As far as forced induction and automatic transmissions, if anything, it really goes the other way. It takes a special automatic transmission that can handle the kind of power generated by a FI setup on a 6 cyl or above engine. Hats off to Porsche for making a truly great auto (lord knows Honda sure didn't for the NSX!)
Check with your tuner but I was under the impression that to use a SC you need Egas (throttle by wire). If that is the case a MY 99 C2 is not going to work for you because the Egas only came on the C4 in 99 (except for maybe a few very late build date c2's - not sure on that though). It came on both the C2 and C4 in 00 and newer.
lambert,
If you are gonna SC the car I think you'll void your warranty, so a certified car will be a waste of $2k (usually the add'l cost to cert the car). When you find the car take it to a local porsche dealer and get a PPI. There were no differences btwn the 00s and 01s except for maybe a few option packages. If you do go with a C2 definitely get PSM, even in the rain it can save your butt.
Don't limit your search to the tri-state area, x-country shipping is $1k at most. Make a list of the options you MUST have and try autotrader.com
I know that Todd at Evo has SC'd a 3.6 Tip 'cause I was checking into it. I have an 02 Tip (wife thing) and with the wheel switches you develop a different kind of fun. In a NA Tip you're not going to win any races, but I don't know the performance specs on a SC'd 3.4 or 3.6. Maybe Todd has some figures. I agree about the MY being less important than how the car has been treated.
I have just listed my 02-04 Aero I kit on eBay lastnight.....
The story behind it is that the front bumper and the drivers side pieces were damaged when they were on the car so I simply purchased them brand new from Porsche. The good side skirt and the rear hatch/wing are in excellent condition and are painted black the color of my car. If you are really interested send me a PM and I can give you more details..... Even if you have the 99-01 996 I can help you get the fenders and lights for a face lift....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
-Eli