12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLongnose Lust
Leading reported evidence
Clean iconic lines
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Clean iconic lines' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean iconic lines' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T190023Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Well I havent driven it much, under a cover now because its snowing. It is light, a tad underpowered, leans a bit, requires you to be in the right gear on hills, etc. In short a real drivers car compared to the newer 911s that will get you out of most of your sophomoric mistakes. I just love staring at the clean iconic lines. I just keep thinking-- NEVER LIFT.
Which color is that? Is that the Albertblau? Beautiful car. My fiancee's step-dad has a 71T and I keep trying to get him to give it to me as a wedding gift!
Brian
That's a beautiful car - congrats - one of my neighbors has a similar year in white - his is pretty nice, but I really like your color a lot more and I'm super impressed by the exterior's condition - please keep us posted about your experiences - I guess we won't be able to hear anything until the spring, but I look forward to seeing and hearing more. Happy Holidays.
"It is light, a tad underpowered, leans a bit, requires you to be in the right gear on hills, etc. I just keep thinking-- NEVER LIFT."
Zed, you've got it all figured out! You appear to be moving back in Porsche time (your T is a beauty - they love to rev, yet have a suprisingly strong & flat torque curve - for a 2.2). I predict a 356 in your future. Cheers!
Thanks guys. The car has been extensively and completely restored which is why it looks new. The color is a custom blue chosen by the PO. Oh, if I could only afford a 356 also. These early cars are a real pull for me.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
