28 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH$15 Tire Mounting and Roadforce Balancing
Leading reported evidence
Check dismount and remount - as you mentioned
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To take it a step further with a car that has vibration issues, the tire and wheel should be "matched" and the only way to do this is mount, check, dismount and remount - as you mentioned.
Leading evidence: 'Check dismount and remount - as you mentioned' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check dismount and remount - as you mentioned' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Changing tires on a Porsche is just like changing tires on any other car, not sure why anyone would refuse the work.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Some times I love having my own shop and doing everything for free, well maybe a few cents for the power to run the balancer and compressor, but still free.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You have to use a traditional clamping machine, so I make sure I have both styles of machines and that my guys can use both.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check dismount and remount - as you mentioned
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To take it a step further with a car that has vibration issues, the tire and wheel should be "matched" and the only way to do this is mount, check, dismount and remount - as you mentioned.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Some times I love having my own shop and doing everything for free, well maybe a few cents for the power to run the balancer and compressor, but still free.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My Coats balancer will balance a wheel just as accurately as my Roadforce balancer, but it wont "road force" the wheel, We use both machines to balance and will charge the same, but if someone wants to actually have a road force balancing done we will check it, spin the tire, re balance etc but we will charge additional for it.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I wouldn't say that technology like roadforce balancers lead to unskilled technicians, When I started in tires 12 years ago, I was taught to mount and balance using pry bars and spoons.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If someone is charging for it and not going through the process of spinning the tire and matching up the wheel and rim, just using the roadforce balancer to balance, then yes I agree it is a scam.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
28 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I just had 2 tires dismounted, mounted and Hunter Roadforce balanced by The Wheel Doctor in Elmsford, NY for $15 a piece!
This recession does have its good points.
They also do wheel straightening and crack repair. For all interested, their number is [phone removed].
The Wal-mart down the road from me charges $7/tire for mount and balance, including on/off the car. (Disposal is another $2 extra, but the city will take old tires for free, so we just bring them home and save $8.) I took my tires to an indie shop instead, as I knew they had a good machine and they came highly recommended. I think I paid $15/tire, to. Changing tires on a Porsche is just like changing tires on any other car, not sure why anyone would refuse the work. If anything, I'd expect it's not so much the car, as the stereotype of Porsche owners and the perceived increased liability for any tiny little bit of damage to the wheels.
15 is a great price. I pay 20-25 a wheel when I switch to R comps. In effect spending 160-200 for a DE weekend plus tips of course. I really need to invest in some hollow spokes.
Old thread alert... Good job dood.
I was picking up my wifes Toyota at the dealer and was telling service manager about a slight shimmy I had with my Porsche and he liked my car so much he drove it back and for $20 did all 4 of them and no more shimmy. Now that's what a dealer should be.
Some times I love having my own shop and doing everything for free, well maybe a few cents for the power to run the balancer and compressor, but still free. Even better is the fact I can do it myself, so I know the quality going into it.
Roadforce balancing. What ticks me off is that we are offered this service at an extra cost. When you buy a set of tires you naturally pay for the tires to be mounted and
balanced
. Shouldn't we expect that the shop will install the tires on the wheels vibration free to begin with?
We're paying for mounting and balancing in the first place, not mounting and nearly balanced. "Well, for additional charge we can balance them precisely so you have no vibrations". Huh? Aren't I paying you already to do just that?
Sorry, rant over. I just went through this recently buying some tires. I think "Roadforce Balancing" is an extra cost gimmick passed on to the consumer.
This timing is about right......and 2 years later this pops up again. I just had my wife's done a few weeks ago at Tire Barn. $15 / each. Can we wait another 2 years for the next update?
Do you know what road force balancing is? The reason that most places will charge more for roadforce balancing is that the tire has to be mounted and dismounted twice. tire and wheel combination can be mounted and balanced in a single go.
To roadforce balance you mount and inflate the tire, then run it on the balancer the first it will tell you not only where the balance is out like normal balancing, but it will tell you how to optimally mount the tire onto the rim to compensate not only for balance, but also for the wheels being ovaled damaged or out of true. Once you have this info, you have to dismount the tire again and remount it on the rim where the balancer told you before rebalancing it a second time, this time adding weights
My shop charges $30 to mount and balance any passenger car or minivan tire, $35 to mount and balance any larger SUV or Truck tire, and $50 to Roadforce Balance
I will mount and balance to a standard that will satisfy 99% of consumers for one price, if someone wants me to do the job twice, yes I will charge them more.
There is no need to remove the tire again, simply deflate the tire, knock the bead loose & spin the tire on the wheel to the optimum position. Also no need for a RoadForce balancer. All that's needed is basic machines & a trained & non- apathetic "tech". If the tire/wheel combo has excessive up & down "hop" runout, spin the tire 180 degrees on the wheel & rebalance.
Once upon a time tires & wheels came with marks to indicate where to mount the tire to align the high spot with the low spot.
This is true to an extent, but there are a couple flaws in this.
1) Over half of tires are still marked from the manufacturer, but the problem with this is that they mark the tire in the heavy spot not the high spot, they also assume that the valve stem location is the light spot in the rim. This is fine for static balancing but not so great for dynamic balancing. This is the reason that manufacturers are not marking tires as often.
2) Most tire and rim combinations where roadforce balancing is beneficial are the same combinations where just breaking the beads and spinning the tire is near impossible. Have you tried spinning a run flat tire? what about 90% of tires that have a sidewall profile of 45 or below? It is nearly impossible. Those soft sidewalled, and high sidewall profile tires that are easy to spin on the rim are ones that are affected least by roadforce balancing.
I am familiar with the proper way to "Roadforce Balance" as in mounting and dismounting, etc. Many shops won't do that but are still selling the "Roadforce" term and simply balancing the tire to a more finite degree.
Balancing isn't rocket science. I had one installer tell me that the majority of consumers will never feel the difference if their tires aren't zeroed out on the machine but they simply leave it at that. It saves them time. Some cars are more sensitive to even the smallest imbalance in a tire and must be zeroed out (as it should be in the first place).
To take it a step further with a car that has vibration issues, the tire and wheel should be "matched" and the only way to do this is mount, check, dismount and remount - as you mentioned.
My original post was that some shops are selling the additional expense but not really "matching" the wheel and tire. My wheels in this case were checked and were perfect in every regard prior to tire mounting.
There are always exceptions to every rule, thats where properly training techs comes into play. How does properly clocking the tire on the wheel inhibit dynamic balancing? Nothing is perfect but better is better.
RoadForce balancers lead to unskilled users in my experience as a consumer.
Realistically most vehicles wont feel a wheel out of balance until the total weight is out over 1oz. For many truck tires there is no real point in balancing them perfectly to 0oz, when some of these wheels require 3-6oz per side trying to get it perfectly to 0oz is a waste of time, it will never be felt and trying to organize that much weith on a wheel is a PIA.
My Coats balancer will balance a wheel just as accurately as my Roadforce balancer, but it wont "road force" the wheel, We use both machines to balance and will charge the same, but if someone wants to actually have a road force balancing done we will check it, spin the tire, re balance etc but we will charge additional for it. If the tire is pretty well matched up to begin with we wont charge extra since we aren't spinning it.
If someone is charging for it and not going through the process of spinning the tire and matching up the wheel and rim, just using the roadforce balancer to balance, then yes I agree it is a scam.
When the tire is marked, it calculated the lightest point in the tire, on a single plane, not factoring the difference between inside and outside. This is fine for static balancing (or dynamic on a single plane, which is basically the same thing) as it does not factor in balancing on the front and back side (dual plane). But in dynamic balancing where it measures balance on the front and back side and the tire is not, the whole matching up the dot to the valve stem is not as helpful. It may help a bit with dynamic balancing, but not as much old school static balancing.
I wouldn't say that technology like roadforce balancers lead to unskilled technicians, When I started in tires 12 years ago, I was taught to mount and balance using pry bars and spoons. I learnt how to balance using a bubble balancer. I can line up the dot with the valve, and static it on a bubble balancer, but realistically no matter how hard I work at it, I will always be able to get a more accurate balance when I have a road force balancer, can spin the tire to exactly where it needs to be, and have a laser aligner telling me exactly where to put the weights.
I still have a bubble balancer that everyone knows how to use. I think most decent tire shops that dont hire random kids off the street (aka walmart) will train their techs how to mount and balance using all possible techniques, in case of a loss of power, certain types of rims and tires that aren't compatible with other types of equipment. for example, the Corghi tire machines are excellent tire machines, but you cant mount Ram 20 wheels on it since the center clamp will crush the plastic cover. You have to use a traditional clamping machine, so I make sure I have both styles of machines and that my guys can use both. If someone wants me to use a bubble balancer I will, chances are it will be balanced well enough that the customer wouldn't notice. But realistically it wont be nearly as accurate.
Sorry guys... didn't mean to stir the pot. I was just hoping to find out the best place to take my car to get new tires mounted at reasonable price. I hesitate to take my 997 wheels to just any shop.
Actually, most firestones have road force balancing, and they do it for the regular price. In fact, i think all of them around me only do road force balancing, using hunter equip. I want to sat they charged me abt $20/wheel when i had p zeros mounted in july. Make sure you note any existing damage on the rims with them when you drop it off...
Tire shops seem to have so much employee churn that getting even a good standard balance and not having your wheels scratched and beaten is a crap-shoot. Even at the reputable places.
There was a great local tire shop around me for many years. The owner did tons of race cars and classic vehicle wheels/tires personally, and always spent the extra time to do it right. Sadly he sold out to the tire chain guys...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.