15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH1999 C2 - rear shocks leaking. Suggestions for replacements?
Leading reported evidence
Check suncoast
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I've checked Suncoast before, never saw that page.
1999 C2 - rear shocks leaking. Suggestions for replacements?
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Check suncoast' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check suncoast' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
1999 C2 - rear shocks leaking. Suggestions for replacements?
Replace shocks anyway, might make sense
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you need to replace your shocks anyway, might make sense but as an 'upgrade' over a fine condition stock suspension, money is IMHO better spent elsewhere than ROW-M030.
1999 C2 - rear shocks leaking. Suggestions for replacements?
Run reduced clearance in the back
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I've got the +2qt LNE oil pan / deep sump so even at stock ride heights I am already running reduced clearance in the back, so I'm a bit worried about dropping another inch or more with coil overs.
1999 C2 - rear shocks leaking. Suggestions for replacements?
Replace shocks anyway, might make sense
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you need to replace your shocks anyway, might make sense but as an 'upgrade' over a fine condition stock suspension, money is IMHO better spent elsewhere than ROW-M030.
1999 C2 - rear shocks leaking. Suggestions for replacements?
Run reduced clearance in the back
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I've got the +2qt LNE oil pan / deep sump so even at stock ride heights I am already running reduced clearance in the back, so I'm a bit worried about dropping another inch or more with coil overs.
1999 C2 - rear shocks leaking. Suggestions for replacements?
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T165639Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi,
1999 C2 with 82k mi, RMS and IMSB done, drives fine, plan to keep it for awhile and track it once a month or so. (I'm a grandpa timewise but courteous about point by's - still dealing with mental fall out of recently getting out of a car that dropped 50 feet off a hill and burning to a charred hull; forcing myself to "get back on the horse" but still shaken and have occasional nightmares)
Should be 50/50 street / track (have other cars for DD)
There's moisture on both rear shocks, though damping and rebound are fine, no bouncing.
I've got the +2qt LNE oil pan / deep sump so even at stock ride heights I am already running reduced clearance in the back, so I'm a bit worried about dropping another inch or more with coil overs.
Considering
rebuild stock shocks
replacing all four and going to coilovers. Considering
H&R (least expensive of the "brand names")
Ohlins
Bilstein PSS10
KW
Koni
ZF Sachs (OEM)
Others? D2, Ksport at al seem much less expensive, wondering if their quality or reliability / performance is commensurate?
Would appreciate any and all feedback and thoughts.
Is it possible to fit coilovers and keep factory spec ride height?
Adjustability is not that much of a consideration for me - I like the idea, but the reality is that I seldom / never use it. But I DON'T want to scrape the oil pan!
Thanks in advance.
on a high speed track (Fontana AAA ROVAL - half Nascar oval with high speed banking, half infield road course)
I always felt the car was a wallowing, soft and imprecise ... on the street but wow, at speed, it was smooth all around. Even the loose and flabby shifter (in street driving) seemed to work just right.
Was it high speed euphoria making everything seem just right, or was it downforce and aero (remember, it's stock C2 non-aero) that put the car into its true designed in "operating zone?"
Certainly not surgically precise turn in and mindblowing seemingly endless grip and flat cornering attitude of a GT3 RS (which I've had experience with on track) but not the wallowing cruiseship I expected either. In some ways, ironically, I actually preferred how the 996 felt at 6/10 on the track...odd.
If the rear shocks weren't leaking, I might even consider keeping it totally factory stock! (shocker)
How about ROW M030 setup? I have this option on my car and just love it. Works well on road and track.
I think it's 25mm lower than stock? (stock USA suspension)
Forget the d2 and k-sport, those are chinese cheap cr.p...
With a bit of luck you can find a set of GT3 shocks for the same as or even a bit less than the M030. I've been very happy with my GT3 suspension setup. Height adjustable but no damping adjustment BTW.
I bought mine here
http://www.suncoastparts.com/product...=996Suspension
It made a slight difference, little bit lower, little bit stiffer, and felt better all around. Major plus for me, it is Porsche spec equipment so my vehicle is all stock.
Thanks for the link! I've checked Suncoast before, never saw that page.
GT3 shocks - I'm assuming they'd have to be used to be price competitive? I was in love with the 997.2 GT3RS but tracking the stock 996.1 really opened my eyes...
You may be thinking of the X73/74 option. 73's for Turbo and C4S. 74 for our cars. I love mine. Sadly it appears they are no longer available.
If you do lower the car I would suggest you get a engine protection plate or get one fabbed at local sheet metal shop.
You might be thinking of the highly regarded X73 and X74 suspension kits that are no longer available...
(Edit: I see SneakyPete already posted this info...)
ROW M030 is still readily available at a reasonable cost, but doesn't provide that big of a difference over stock. If you need to replace your shocks anyway, might make sense but as an 'upgrade' over a fine condition stock suspension, money is IMHO better spent elsewhere than ROW-M030.
Also, Bilstein will rebuild your current struts for about $75/each...
I'd look at the pss10, they are awesome. The great thing about them is at full soft, they are very close to stock but better. You can also adjust them without taking off the wheels.
You can also set them very close to stock height. I can safely say that this is one of the best mod for the 996.
Thanks, PSS10's were my frontrunners as well but from a purely practical standpoint (I am notorious for NOT being practical when I make hobby decisions) they are probably more than I need for the track (I've got another more purely track focused car with PSS9's and GT3 components) and possibly too low for the street, with my LNE +2 sump kit and equal parts street driving.
ROW030 or for $800 more, the H&R vs + $1800 for the PSS10's or Sachs or Ohlins.
But always open to hearing other POV. Thanks for offering to discuss offline.