12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAlingment Help!
Leading reported evidence
Install row m030
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Here's how I set mine up after I installed the RoW M030 --
Leading evidence: 'Install row m030' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust from there' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'm running -2.5F/-2.0R (245F/295R) and the car feels fine.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I run the X74 spec since I have the X74 suspension.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Tomorrow I will be taking my 02 C2 for a new alingment. I would like to get something a bit more agressive than the stock alingment. (My car has the stock suspension). Does anyone have any specs that have worked in the past? my car is driven 70% track and AutoX and 30% weekend toy. The understeer in this car is unacceptable
Thanks for any help
Here are the stock alignment settings. You can adjust from there. I would talk to the service manager and the tech if possible to try to get the settings you want/need.
Sorry to go OT here but was your alignment guy able to get the back in spec? The elliptical bolts didn't give mine enough play to get within specs with the X74.
I have that Spec Sheet too, I think you can not get more than -1 Deg of camber up front (without gt3 parts). I will try to get at least that much and leave everything else the same... I am taking her tomorrow morning so I we will see what my mechanic says.
Get as much Negative camber in the front as you can...still won't be much.
I'd go 0 toe front..maybe even a touch of toe-out if it really sees 70% of it's time at track and auto-x.
just my .02
Here's a link that could help.
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ght=996+camber
I'm running -2.5F/-2.0R (245F/295R) and the car feels fine. If you really want to get some more info, talk to the guys at TRG since they have a lot of experience.
With the X74 kit in place the rear aligned just fine. Trying to do it with another length strut/spring assembly might be different.
Remember the geometry will be affected by the lengths of the parts you add and will affect the range of adjustability with the stock alignment bolts, tie rods, etc.
I just got back from the shop, and unfortunately all we could get on the front was -0.4 degrees negative camber on each tire. we set the toe to 0 up front also. At the back we did -1.2 on each side and 0.08" of Toe... tomorrow I will go out for a drive and see how it feels... the car before alingment had 0.3 of positive camber up front!!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
