fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHLet's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30

Reported or suspected cause

ride quality

Reported cause

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause · Original poster

At issue is ride quality.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30
Frequently discussed work

Replace their suspensions

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would have to guess it is very small, considering all of the people that replace their suspensions on this board.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'ride quality' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'ride quality' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace their suspensions' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Run m030

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I run M030 on a daily driver.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30

Replace their suspensions

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would have to guess it is very small, considering all of the people that replace their suspensions on this board.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30

Use same sway bars

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Your best bet will be the X74 as they are stiffer than the M030 and use the same sway bars.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace their suspensions

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would have to guess it is very small, considering all of the people that replace their suspensions on this board.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30

Run m030

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I run M030 on a daily driver.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30

Use same sway bars

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Your best bet will be the X74 as they are stiffer than the M030 and use the same sway bars.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

ride quality

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause · Original poster

At issue is ride quality.

Let's be honest X74 vs. ROW MO30
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I've been carping about the handling of our new 40th Anniversary (US MO30 varient) since we first got in the car. After spending some time reading various boards, the impression I make on my own matches that of others. So, its suspension time. From my point of view we go with Porsche parts. That's a big period at the end of that sentence. Options are ROW MO30 or X74. Ride height is not an issue. 1), doing this to get the car to handle and don't care what it looks like. 2), I just measured our 530 with the sports suspension. The 530's lowest point in the front is a full 2" lower than the lowest part of the chin spoiler on the 40th. The BMW is a far more compliant (squat) set-up than a 996 and I have no issues with it nor have heard of any complaints on the E39 boards. Cost is not an issue. The two options are within $500 of each other. Installation, I assume, is the same other than I have to spring for alignment on X74 but I'd have them look at the alignment if we do ROW MO30 anyway. Car will be setup for street. If it get's DE'd or tracked I'll live with whatever is in the car. Handling: the X74 appears to have the edge with no arguments I've seen. At issue is ride quality. From those of you who have gone from the ROW MO30 to the X74, what is the difference? Currently (with the tire pressures reduced to 32/36) the ride is very well controlled and very good. No skittering in rough corners and the ABS has been silent since we pulled down the pressures.

POST 2Original post

I don't think it is a really correct to compare the ride height of your 530 and the 996 because the overhang on the 996 is much longer and that means higher chance of scraping. My stock 40th scrapes the front coming in and out of driveways, I simply can't imagine lowering it another 1.5 inches with the X74!

POST 3Original post

just a comment but: i had a 530i sport b4 my 911 and....just on asthetics the 530 wins hands down in terms of how hunched down the car is over the wheels...and BM only had 17's My 911 looks like a 4x4 next to the 530

POST 4Original post

i got x74 on my 996 03 i like it lot at the track but at the street of LA not so good but change to pss9 euro next week on the m030 lower about 10 to 15 mm ride is the same

POST 5Original post

reference this report, it's exactly what you're after: Porsche 996 Suspension PCA article by the way, i have RoWM030, it firmed up the ride and lowered it only slightly, it's a slight improvement, but not very much "felt." i'd do X74 if i had to do it over again (my car is a daily driver, no track/de, etc).

POST 6Original post

I too have a 530i w/sport suspension. It has never dragged the ground on anything, and it does sit nicely on its tires. My '03 Targa with the X74 suspension drags a lot. But it doesn't look like a 4X4 anymore. My 2 cents worth. My car was not purchased for DE's or other track events. I may participate at some point, but not now. The X74 lowered the car the same as all the other posts here indicate. It looks great compared to the standard ride height. The ride is markedly different to me as the driver, but my wife really hasn't seemed to notice a lot. It feels more go-kart'ish with the X74, and the dampening in the shocks is very different. In fact, I put the old front sway bar back on my car to get rid of some of the "knife edging" I was feeling with the new front bar. It also relaxed some of the shock rebound changes as well. Overall, I'm happy. But, it is stiff at times, and low all the time, and feels completely different in its handling characteristics. I haven't experienced the ROW 030, so I can't be of any benefit there. I was chasing ride height with my choice, and I got what I wanted. All other aspects of the install requires some type of personal growth or adjustment. Dwayne

POST 7Original post

I decided to go the route of Bilstein PSS9's after consulting with several regular 996 track junkies and Porsche shops. They were put on yesterday and the car gets aligned today. I'll be at Thunderhill Friday to try out the new set up and alignment. I'm going to try lower pressures as many have recommended. I'll post a few pic's when I get the car back this evening.

POST 8Original post

I run M030 on a daily driver. It is almost too stiff for me on bad roads. On most Atlanta roads, it's fine, when you hit a bad one it's pretty harsh. I would not put X74 on a street car but that's just me; I have a track car for the fun days Roy

POST 9Original post

Both of your options will void warrenty regarding the suspension,rattles and squeaks. According to my dealer today those are ROW and give them a way out. The x-74 will be much better for performance. But you seem to lean towards comfort so the M030 might do the trick. Because of the dealer input, I ordered Pss9 today from Gertt through the group buy. I do track and autoX and would rather have something I can adjust.

POST 10Original post

Roberga: My understanding that neither an X74 or RoW M030 upgrade would void a Porsche factory warranty because both are OEM Porsche parts. Do you kow why your dealer thinks otherwise? Anybody else have experience here? Thanks. Gary

POST 11Original post

My dealer service manager told me that because it is european spec and not U.S. It did not influence me since I wanted something adjustable, but I would make sure from your dealer one way or the other.

POST 12Original post

If you don't like the US M030 then the Row is not an improvement. They have the same spring rates, same antiroll bars. The only difference is the shock valving and the height of the springs. The Row shocks are about 20-30% stiffer than the US M030 and even the US standard is a little stiffer(shocks) than the US sport. Your best bet will be the X74 as they are stiffer than the M030 and use the same sway bars. PSS9 is another good alternative since you can adjust them to suit you. Also have you consider larger sway bar like the H&R that may solve your handling needs. It depends what don't you like about the car now.

POST 13Original post

With regard to the warranty issue, even if it is not covered, what's the chance of having a suspension failure with a part (X74) that is made by Porsche for this car. I would have to guess it is very small, considering all of the people that replace their suspensions on this board. I don't remember seeing anyone complaining about warranty issues on their suspension- other than some who found the X74 to be too stiff. Let's see: My choices are to upgrade to a suspension that is going to make me enjoy my car that much more, or stick with the average factory suspension - but know that I am covered under warranty on a part that is probably not going to break....... No contest! X74 all the way.....

POST 14Original post

CLLACAB: It is not the suspension but everything from a skipping CD changer to tracking down rattles and other noise due to vibration. as I said it does not matter to me since I went with Pss9

POST 15Original post

I know that some have complained about rattles in their cars. Surprisingly, I really don't have any. With regard to skipping of the CD, only if I hit a pot hole really hard does that happen - and that doesn't happen very often.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.