11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHpelican parts
Leading reported evidence
Use pelican and was very happy
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I've used Pelican and was very happy with the service.
Leading evidence: 'Use pelican and was very happy' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use pelican and was very happy' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
A little slow if you communicate through their web system - so use a phone.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Has anybody here used Pelican parts? Is there a discount for non-paying rennlisters like me? How about for paying rennlisters? How about for PCA members? Also, is there a difference between the Porsche brand oil filters and the Mahle?
Pelican is good. I have had a few orders from them. Their web site has good info especially for older 911s ( air cooled ). I have found slightly better prices elsewhere for certain items. I have also used performanceproducts.com , automotion.com and tweeks.com ( mid america motor works now ) . If it is a common item you can usually find it at a couple of different sites to make sure it is priced right.
I agree with man of ice , their ticket system for communication is slow to answer. They have good people at the 1-800 number.
I am still waiting for a parts list of parts I needed for a front conversion (about 8 weeks ago today) and I called them...the sales guy said he would email me a list, so I could order all missing parts...never did.....there parts are expensive!
I ordered standard maintenance items from them last month and was pleasantly surprised. The website originally indicated that I would be charged two shipping charges due to parts being in different warehouses. Even so, I placed the order.
At some point they combined the shipment and removed the second shipping charge - a few days later I had my filters, etc. As far as I'm concerned that's great service.
I just went to the Porsche dealer around the corner of my studio in Long Beach, Circle Imports, they gave me a 10% discount with my PCA membership card.
Spend about 1+K in parts...
That's what I've heard before, but according to another site I've used in the past for MB parts that also sells Porsche parts, while they sell Mahle they list Hengst as OE.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
