27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2002 C2 0-60mph
Leading reported evidence
Run between a '99-01 v
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run between a '99-01 v' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run between a '99-01 v' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Are you trying to be difficult or does it just come naturally?
Every single post of yours is designed to antagonize or otherwise mock other posters - many of whom have been around longer and contributed much more to the community.
If you're so miserable to be here that you must make life difficult for everyone else, perhaps you are in the wrong spot?
OJ....come on man. You were doing so well after your temporary ban from the board by the moderators. Just chill out and let some of the lesser posts go. Not sure if you try to antagonize or if it just comes out that way sometimes. You can't let every post you perceive as dumb or insulting to affect you. Now go enjoy that beuatiful P-Car of yours, drop the top and get some good ole fashioned P-Car therapy! Speaking of that, I am off for a spin around the neighborhood myself.
oj, listen to anthony on this one. Any boy who likes insulting good people from behind the keyboard only is manly enough to listening to.
Hi honey, you still haven't rsvp'd for our beer next week!
Don�t' let it bother you there are a lot of people that live off of others. I'm sure that some day you will come up with and spend the whole $25 to join.
Hi Mark (aka: "undertheradar"),
I think you have me confused with LV, who you appear to have some sort of fetish about, which is why I deleted a few of your previous threads/posts.
You see - LV can't delete stupid threads/posts - I can...
LV can't BAN users - I can...
Now - not that I'm insulted, but I certainly didn't get an invitation for a beer??? But, in spite of that...
I did delete your posts & I did just BAN you...
John D.
John D. - GOOD MOVE!
I could not figure out why "undertheradar" seemed hell bent on attacking Dell. He was antagonistic and abrasive right from the start. I, for one, will not miss him at all.
