17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs it time for new rear tires?
Leading reported evidence
Check when i
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The wear looks even so alignment seems good, but I always have my alignment checked when I change tires just to be sure.
Leading evidence: 'Check when i' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check when i' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Then the fronts will be old enough to replace so you can get a new set of 4.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The wear looks even so alignment seems good, but I always have my alignment checked when I change tires just to be sure.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Yep. When they hit the wear markers it's time.
The wear looks even so alignment seems good, but I always have my alignment checked when I change tires just to be sure.
I wouldn't drive 'em in the rain, but they're not that bad.
I corded my last set of MPS's (without realizing they were that worn down) and they were wicked scary in the rain......
Oops......
Next time, get some directional tires (I'm assuming these are assymetrics). You can rotate them by re remounting them on the opposite side of the axle and get a lot more mileage out of them. If you look closely, the insides of the tires are worn much more than the outsides because of the heavy negative camber in the rear end.
Depends on your comfort level and the thickness of your wallet. I'd be OK with at least 500 more miles. Too bad you can't flip them side to side and get another 2K+ out of them like the Michelin PS2 N3 and some others. I know it's foolish to push your luck with tires and also realize that when some get that low the compound changes and the tires don't handle or grip very well.
If you don't drive a lot maybe they could last through the summer then, in the fall you could think about getting some for the spring 2013. Then the fronts will be old enough to replace so you can get a new set of 4.
My tires are somewhere between Fergus' and Derek's. Still feel ok on dry roads but a real lesson in smooth inputs when it's raining! Now it's time to find the right replacements that will stick like glue in all road & track conditions, will wear forever and and won't break the bank!
It takes me over a year of grooming & care to get my tires to the golden time where yours are! Minimum tread squirm & noise. I drive mine until I see threads, of course it never rains in So. CA !
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
