18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHneed some quick advice
Reported or suspected cause
lack of communication
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'lack of communication' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'lack of communication' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check manual - every 2 years is what it states' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I checked my manual - every 2 years is what it states.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Remember, they dented my car and didn't tell me about it, replaced the RMS without telling me about it......
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
BS on airbag - should be inspected/replaced every 10 years.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The reservoir cap allows the system to breathe, to allow for fluid level changes, such as when you push the pedal down or the brake pads wear or are replaced.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T042512Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Dealer calls me that I need to do some airbag test (done every two years)... have you heard about this?
Also, tells me I need a Brake Flush (supposed to be dome very two years as well)... isn't that done as part of 30K miles
Car is 2003 with 39K miles on it.
should I do these?
BS on airbag - should be inspected/replaced every 10 years.
Brake flush sounds excessive, but I can't put my hands on the schedule.... should be in the manual.
BS on the air bag test. Tell them they are air bags! < hee hee>
I agree with Ray. Brake flush every 2 years especially if you DON't track the car. Water has a tendancy to get in the brake fluid, so this is good preventative maintenance. I had Hendrick do a Brake Flush about 4 - 5 months ago.
Okay, so if I do 5K per year and don't take my car out in the rain, then why should I be changing the fluid every 10K? Doens't make a lot of sense to me.
I tend to agree. If they pull a stunt like this, then you don't know when they're telling you the truth and when they're trying to up-sell on a service.
The first time a dealer does something like this to me I get annoyed. The second time they do it I find another placed to take my car.
Wayne - brake fluid absorbs moisture, which in turn will lower the boiling point of the brake fluid by as much as 30%. The excess water moisture can cause valves to corrode and stick. The moisture can create a rusty sludge that can clog the valves and pistons in the brake system.
http://www.brakefluidtester.com/downloads/clean.PDF
http://www.type2.com/library/brakes/brakef.htm
Thanks for the links Tim. The second one is particularly useful. I was hoping for an indicator of when the fluid needed changing and I liked the dark and cloudy indicator - simple and effective. I'll have to inspect my fluid.
I know about the hygroscopic nature of the fluid and the ability to corrode when saturated, but the sad thing is that often it is recommended to chaange fluids out long before it is actually needed (think engine oil!) - hence my sceptisism.
The brake system is sealed, so the ability to get water into a sealed system on a car that does not go out in the rain is low. If we're talking about Phil's car which doesn't leave the garage, then it's virtually nil.
I'm a big fan of preventative maintenance, but not a big fan of changing things that might not need to be changed.
I agree with you that they are money hungry, but it's the only P car dealer in Charlotte.
Tim (or anybody else in Charlotte), what are your overall thoughts re Hendrick Porsche? I feel they always seem to be pushing extra 'service'
I have not been impressed with Hendrick's service. Their biggest problem is lack of communication. They communicate poorly with their clients and they seem to have an internal communication problem.
About a week after they diagnosed that I had a bad CAT, I called to see when the part would come in. They said it was in the shop. I asked why no one had called me so I could get this replaced. Parts didn't tell the service guy that the part came in. Remember, they dented my car and didn't tell me about it, replaced the RMS without telling me about it...... poor communication!
Pretty pathetic customer service. I would rate them a 4 on a scale of 1 to 10.
Actually, no, the brake system is not sealed. The reservoir cap allows the system to breathe, to allow for fluid level changes, such as when you push the pedal down or the brake pads wear or are replaced. So that allows the atmosphere, which is full of water vapor, to meet with the fluid.
I thought that brake fluid changes were part of the annual service, but two years is probably adequate. I wouldn't base it on how the fluid looks either.
It's cheap insurance for a very expensive system that you have on a very expensive car. And best of all, it's really quite simple and you can do it yourself with no special tools. If you can do an oil change, you can bleed the brakes.
Michael
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.