16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWell, I finally did it and Love the Look!
Leading reported evidence
Replace upon first glance
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I actually didn't even notice the sidemarker change upon first glance.
Leading evidence: 'Replace upon first glance' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace upon first glance' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
After dealing with things that were higher on my priority list, I finally got around to getting rid of the dreaded "Pumpkins". At first it really didn't make much sense to me, but I started thinking about it, and after looking around I could see that this was something that I needed to do.
Here is a Before and an after shot of the car. The car didn't have tinted Windows when I had the Orange lights in, but after tinting the Windows I realized that the white lights would make a nice classy touch to an already beautiful car. (It seems, and maybe this is in my head, but it seems that people stare at the front end a little more now??)
When I decided that I was going to tint the Windows, I knew the Pumpkins had to go....In my opinion it really adds a nice touch to the car! My Brother was looking at it and I hadn't told him that I did it, he kept asking me what was different and he said that the car looks great, but he couldn't pinpoint what it was about the car that made it look that way...Then of course I told him....He said he couldn't believe that something so little could make the car look so different.
Like everything else in life, it is the little subtle things that really make a difference. So to all of those here that have posted their pictures of their cars with the "White Lights", I thank you. Because I probably never would have thought of doing that until I saw someone's car with them and thought to myself that I really like that look!
Thanks, I feel it just looks cleaner....
I am not too sure on the exact name of the Rims as they came with the car when I bought them. I went thru the Paper work to see if there was a "Name" for them and only found the term "Black+C-Lip".
I will PM you the place where they came from in case you are interested in looking into these with some more detail?
Yep , looks good and might be better to do the heads and tails in clear ( or smoked) lenses. On the black car, a very big difference.
Complete amberectomy!
A silver /black hood crest would be a plus , too!
did you just do the side markers or did you do the tip of the headlights also, as for the rims, i think those are ruff racing wheels, & i think you can buy all four for $692++ on ebay! you can get them in black or polished silver, with the chrome lip, mine are similar, but yours have the 2-spoke, plus black.
imho, that would look horribly cheap.
The ideal is to swap out the very dated looking halogen headlight unit with litronics. swap out the rear as well with OEM clears.
It'll freshen up the look drastically. right now, the car looks extremely dated.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
