fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Leading reported evidence

Replace anywhere between 30k and 90k miles

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I've seen (on this forum) clutches being replaced anywhere between 30K and 90K miles.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace anywhere between 30k and 90k miles' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace anywhere between 30k and 90k miles' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 26 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Replace clutch and tranny

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Clutch and tranny have been replaced, seems like a great car - on paper anyway - except for the miles.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Replace every damned part

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I replaced every damned part on that thing - now it flys like new!

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Use from a private party

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Or don't be afraid to buy used from a private party.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Run very nicely

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It's now at 73k miles and running very nicely, but I seriously doubt I'd get $39,999 for it.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?
Frequently discussed actions (5)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace anywhere between 30k and 90k miles

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I've seen (on this forum) clutches being replaced anywhere between 30K and 90K miles.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Replace clutch and tranny

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Clutch and tranny have been replaced, seems like a great car - on paper anyway - except for the miles.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Replace every damned part

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I replaced every damned part on that thing - now it flys like new!

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Run very nicely

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It's now at 73k miles and running very nicely, but I seriously doubt I'd get $39,999 for it.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?

Use from a private party

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Or don't be afraid to buy used from a private party.

60k Mile '02 C2 - "High" milage?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

This well optioned 2002 C2 is priced pretty low, due to the 60k mile service interval, I assume? Clutch and tranny have been replaced, seems like a great car - on paper anyway - except for the miles. Assuming the price drops to $36k...is this a great deal, or just so-so? Should the miles scare me off? Thoughts, and thanks! 2002 C2 Link

POST 2Original post

Certainly looks like a great deal. The miles are fine ... I would not be worried about buying a 60K miles 996. What's with the "911 Turbo" front plate? Is it a Porsche CPO car (doesn't look like a Porsche dealer to me)? In any case, get a PPI.

POST 3Original post

A few things don't make sense. The CPO warranty, the wheels and size, the 911 turbo plate on front????. I would definitely check it out in person and have a PPI done. Something about it does not seem right. If it were a good car, then 36K is a fair price.

POST 4Original post

From the ad: "50/50 Perfect front & rear Balance" Really?

POST 5Original post

That's 12K miles a year - doesn't seem outrageous to me. Price seems fair. A CPO (from Porsche) only comes from a (Porsche) dealer or can be transferred from a private seller. It cannot be sold/transferred by a non-Porsche dealer.

POST 6Original post

Agree miles are fine just PPI it if the price is right.

POST 7Original post

miles are fine. I bought my 02 C4S last year with 49k miles. It runs perfect.

POST 8Original post

States no warranty......but can be purchased for $2,000.00. 36k for that car would seem fine to me......with PPI.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Must have been talking about my 944! The ad is kinda misleading, since they are calling it "pre owned certified", I thnk CPO. But it's "certified" by them, not Porsche. Which means nothing. As for the Turbo license plate, just poor P/O taste I guess. I would much rather find the same car with 22k miles on it, but that would probably wind up costing $6k more.

POST 10Original post

very true. no cpo. new clutch/transmission at 12k miles/year, 60k total suggests hard driving, no? kinda weird. did you get carfax report? also, did turbo twists come on 02s, i.e. original wheels? generally, i wouldn't buy from a place like that. plenty of places like that in queens selling high end cars but look downright shady.

POST 11Original post

I would rather buy a 2002 C2 with 70K miles than 10K miles (both being within budget). It's a good idea to stay away from very low mileage cars, they just don;t have much of a "track record". For a 996, I still say 60K is good mileage. Don't worry about it. I'd say, not at all. I've seen (on this forum) clutches being replaced anywhere between 30K and 90K miles. Sometimes, they just do the clutch when doing the RMS / transmission.

POST 12Original post

They are lying, it's NOT a certified pre-owned car.

POST 13Original post

hey gant... you might want to spellcheck your sig, I've never come across a "Carerra" 4S or otherwise.

POST 14Original post

Car looks nice and seems priced well. Kind of strange that it needed a transmission, but these things happen. Get a PPI.

POST 15Original post

Yep, my car needed a new tranny when I bought it.....6th (of all gears) was out. 1999 with ~55,000 miles on it.

POST 16Original post

I know this dealer - about a year ago I almost bought a 1991 BMW 850 from them w/ 32K. They are "shady" and gave me the creeps. That said, it does not necessarily mean the car has any problems. Just, caveat emptor. Do your homework and have the car checked out. They have had other 'seemingly' nice cars before and do seem to move merchandise.

POST 17 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks. I really don't need shady at this point! I may stick with CPO cars and buy from a real Porsche dealer.

POST 18Original post

Have a PPI done at a dealer. I highly doubt they put in a new clutch and a new transmission on thier dime. If its a new clutch the pedal should feel nice and light and smooth. A new transmission, when viewed from underneath wont have any cosmoline on it. I like this car, its similar to what I would buy but I would get a third party (preferably a dealer) to give it a PPI.

POST 19Original post

Or don't be afraid to buy used from a private party.

POST 20Original post

I visited this dealer last summer when they advertised a beautiful blue 99 C2 Cab. They told me the car had been sold the week before. Okay, back to searching. Several weeks later, a search result from cars.com pulls up the same car at this place? I'm sure there could be logical reasons for this to happen, but something gave me a bad gut feeling. Be careful. PPI is a must! tom

POST 21 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

For this kind of purchase (high-end Sports car), I wont be buying from "Sluggo's Cars", or the equivilent! Two people got a bad feeling about this place, so NEXT!

POST 22Original post

I wouldn't let that bother you Tom. I imagine that many dealers won't bother to cancel an ad for a car sold - it may still generate calls, and that's what they want. However, that said, if the place/seller gives you a bad vibe, for whatever reason, then prudence dictates that you walk. Michael

POST 23Original post

I have almost 50k on my 2004, so 60k on a 2002 seems like it wasn't driven enough

POST 24Original post

The mileage isn't high, but the price is. I got my '02 with a CPO and 50k miles for $43,975 last May. It's now at 73k miles and running very nicely, but I seriously doubt I'd get $39,999 for it.

POST 25Original post

Records, records, records, records..........like an airplane, I would not buy a 996 without records......I have every record since my car came to the states.............I would not have it any other way........I never knew the first owner of my car, but I know exactly what was performed in terms of maintenance and repairs....... I really think buying a Porsche is not too dissimiliar from buying a plane if done right..... TENNKTM

POST 26 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I agree...records are key! So are the original manuals and papers - shows the owner cared about the details. My 944 is plane-like. I replaced every damned part on that thing - now it flys like new!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.