fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

EVERYONE PLZ READ: jro996turbo vs. 9ff

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHEVERYONE PLZ READ: jro996turbo vs. 9ff

Leading reported evidence

Run into a major problems

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

One of our good members, jro996turbo has recently run into a major problems with 9ff.

Original post Read captured discussion
EVERYONE PLZ READ: jro996turbo vs. 9ff
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run into a major problems' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run into a major problems' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run into a major problems

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

One of our good members, jro996turbo has recently run into a major problems with 9ff.

Original post Read captured discussion
EVERYONE PLZ READ: jro996turbo vs. 9ff
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I hope everyone can spend a little time and read this post. One of our good members, jro996turbo has recently run into a major problems with 9ff. Here is a link to the thread: https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...5&pagenumber=1 The company has very unique practicing, etc.. You can even see a recent move on their part: http://www.9ff-usa.com/ Basically, John (jro996turbo) has been taken advantage of by this company for over $20,000. I too was taken advantage, but no as badly by this company, 9ff. You can read all the problems, issues, comments, etc.. from the above link. Basically I wanted to make everyone aware here and also we are setting up a collection, as said very well by Colm: "Could the 2000+ readers buy a piece of jro996turbo's troubles for $12 apiece, and then file a class action suit against 9ff. Otherwise we could tell 6 people and they could tell 6 people and so on and so on..then 9ff is out of business; and we're all $12 poorer and a richer and tighter community for it. After all jro996 turbo may have saved us from a potentially unscrupulous company, that hides behind their agents." Thank you for everyone's time and I hope we can all unite and help John out during this time.

POST 4Original post

Yes, I believe in caveat emptor. But I also believe in another Latin phrase that jro and the Porsche community are bringing to 9ff's attention: Caveat Vendor

POST 5Original post

Wow. Just read the whole post at the other forum. I do agree that the civil case should be a slam-dunk against 9ff, both the USA apartment unit and the German unit. Unless, of course, we haven't heard everything. What's jro996turbo waiting for? Go ahead with the case. You can only threaten a few times before they think you are bluffing. There's also the BBB and other consumer protection agencies. Criminal liability and a criminal case should soon follow.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.