36 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRecent Pics
Reported or suspected cause
most of these
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Camera, lens, settings, filters (or not), tripod (or not) - I suspect most of these
Leading evidence: 'most of these' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'most of these' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Set exposure manually' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Or use and external meter and set exposure manually..
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
set it manually but I shoot it a couple times using different times and then take the best one when I do a review of all the shots.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
36 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Some people have hobbies. While he may like to take photographs others like to look at them and there are a ton of people who do, otherwise there wouldn't be so many magazines on the selves.
To answer your question, all the above and more. Wouldn't be human if it you didn't.
Thanks for the compliments guys
Blackness...yeah, stockers are back on, I rotate them once in a while...these are actualy my track tires, will go to DE in Poconos
Jake... Just a hobby of mine... validation?...No, compliments?...yeah sure, self gratification?...absolutely, who isnt?
It only SEEMS that way, id say for one car pics, I have 30+ pics of my family plus more on other subjects, its not just about the car, its about photography... you do not enjoy looking at p-car pics?
Redridge, thanks for sharing the pictures. You are very talented with a camera and your car is an incredible subject. I will never get bored looking at pictures of your car...it's like auto-porno. More of the engine please. I enjoy your pictures almost as much as the pictures on "disregard this thread".
Here are some night shots I've done recently.
They are nice at 800x600 small res but you really appreciate them when they are large. Click on them to get the hig res version.
Photography is a great hobby, and judging by the quality of the the OP's pics, he should be proud to show off the fruits of his labour. Great composition - superlative use of light
As for jm944 - rrroowrr ! nuff said. Too bad about the car! (sorry a cheap shot)
My dad's a photographer so I have an appreciation for "good" photography, although my own skills are basic at best. I get the impression that JakeOK doesn't realize how hard it is to take a genuinely good picture. I for one have never been able to take a *good* shot of my interior for instance. But jeez Jake - Go figure that people only post car pics here.......it's a bloody car forum! To paraphrase an old saying: You can love your car, but you can't race your kids.
Thanks to the advent of digital cameras I have thousands of pictures on my hard drive cars and my family - not much else in fact. Just for Jake: Here's three of my favourite shots of my boy. He's easy to phtograph well and I have quite a few "good" pictures of him. I have yet to get a really "good" picture of the girl though....she's definitely not as photogenic, although every bit as cute in real life. Note that cars are easier to photograph because they sit still and don't have to be coerced into smiling or whatever.
Redridge, thanks for the pics. I have to experience the S/C vicariously. Alex at Sharkwerks just informed me that the 3rd radiator for the S/C won't fit too well with the 3rd radiator for the tip. I can always drive it till the engine needs rebuilt and increase the displacement to 3.7...that should give me a few more ponies and a new engine (easier to justify to wifey). I'm happy to see how good the aerokit looks with the polished wheels. Someday......
redridge, jumper5836 - beautiful shots, both.. mind sharing some more technical details of your photo setup?
Camera, lens, settings, filters (or not), tripod (or not) - I suspect most of these
were taken with a tripod?
Always looking to learn from the masters.
Thanks,
- Nick
Great photos! zicoramone
BoulderNick: All the night shots are done with a tripod. 6-20 sec exposures depending on how much light there is.
Nikon D80 18-135 lens
polarized filter
jumper5836: spectacular pics... love the skyline shots, have to get some with NYC in the background.
jasper: your kids are a natural in font of that camera, love the colors. Thanks for posting
Mfletch: Im almost postive that itzkirby has a tip with a SC, From what I remember he has 4 radiators...
Tmac: I love the SC, no regrets... just recently went to a DE, it performed flawless and loved every minute of it. Didnt run hot at all... though it sucked up some seriouse gas at wot...
Raty: Thanks, the interior is the main reason I bought the car.
zicoramone: that car you have is my model porsche... car looks, evil. love the pictures... post more up
Bouldernick: ... me a master?... hahahahaha, if you take enough pics... just weed out the bad ones. Thats what most photgraphers do. I have a Nikon d200 28-70mm tripod. Set it to manual and play with the timing, depending on how much light and look at the histograms (learn histograms). Also, learn temperature of light to bring out some cool colors... tripod is mandatory.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
