19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhat do you feed your 996?
Reported or suspected cause
germans in the late 60's
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
I've heard it was the Germans in the late 60's that insisted on an alternate octane measure as they were blowing up engines on the Autobahn even with the proper RON.
Leading evidence: 'germans in the late 60's' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'germans in the late 60's' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean air act went' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
are mixed in a pipe and the product gasoline tank is filled over a period of 8-20 hours or so.
Use cheveron (because its the cheapest $/gallon) around my home
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use Cheveron (because its the cheapest $/gallon) around my home.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
5 Additives are important especially to preserve the fuel and to prevent corrosion on cars used infrequently
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Watch out for water in the gas especially at the onset of Winter or during cold snaps, and avoid filling up when the delivery truck is re-filling the station.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I read somewhere in a post, or Excellence, or Pano, that it's a good idea to use different manufactures every couple of fill-ups....the theory being that the buildup from one fuel recipe additives over time can be neutralized by a different manufacturer's recipe.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I find it interesting that the Porsche Shop Manuals recommend fuel filter change interval of 60,000 miles and the O2 sensors (4 of them) seem to be good for more than 100,000 miles as they don't even show up in the maintenance schedule.
Replace are being phased in over the next few years
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It has worked to improve air quality somewhat, and more reformulation changes are being phased in over the next few years but there still is a lot of air that is considered unhealthy and reformulation alone doesn't fix the air pollution problem as there are other sources than cars.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Having worked on Gasoline and Diesel Blending systems at several different refineries in the US, CA, and Europe, I can basically say that Gasoline is a complicated product and is changing a lot as we speak.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
germans in the late 60's
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
I've heard it was the Germans in the late 60's that insisted on an alternate octane measure as they were blowing up engines on the Autobahn even with the proper RON.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
It has worked to improve air quality somewhat, and more reformulation changes are being phased in over the next few years but there still is a lot of air that is considered unhealthy and reformulation alone doesn't fix the air pollution problem as there are other sources than cars.
Some of the Exxon stations around here have been changing over to Mobil, and I got to thinking... are their fuels one and the same? Same parent company, yes, but same refineries?
I usually use Exxon 93 supreme, but reputation for quality and brand recognition are the only 2 good reasons I could come up with. Go Valdez!
What do you use and why? Any CHEMICAL ENGINEERS out there with some scientific explanation as to why I should choose one fuel over the other?
We've all done it. You're on fumes and just pass that Citgo like it didn't even exist!
Bill, where ya at? No flames from the Royal Dutch supporters, please... hahaha
It seems to thrive on this diet, along with full throttle sprints. Cities make it listless and sulky. Interstates make it restless and resentful.
Top trainers recommend this diet, with an occasional quart of 0W40 as a supplement.
I use Cheveron (because its the cheapest $/gallon) around my home. If I'm near work, I use the local Unocal (because that's the cheapest fuel nearby).
However I have noticed that I seem to get more mpg on the Unocal gas vs. the Cheveron.
I read somewhere in a post, or Excellence, or Pano, that it's a good idea to use different manufactures every couple of fill-ups....the theory being that the buildup from one fuel recipe additives over time can be neutralized by a different manufacturer's recipe. IOW the different formulations have a beneficial effect. (93+oct/and no ethanol, of course)
Having worked on Gasoline and Diesel Blending systems at several different refineries in the US, CA, and Europe, I can basically say that Gasoline is a complicated product and is changing a lot as we speak. Fuel is different in various US zones based on the measured air quality. I.e. Los Angeles has special RFG (Reformulated) where rural areas can still sell conventional gas. Most zones get different volatility fuel in Summer, Winter, and Spring/Fall. Engine design (compression ratio for example) and fuel design are evolving together to meet demand for cleaner air (CO, NOx, unburned HC and many other pollutants) and the demand for more power and economy. In Jan 2004, for example you should be seeing big Sulfur reductions. High Sulfur in the US was thought to be the main reason for the Nikosil engine failures at BMW in the mid 90's. Remember the carbon build up issues on intake valves a few years ago, I think that new additives and modified engines solved that one. Your engine has become a chemical reactor with a sophisticated reactor control system needed to meet emissions qualifications. Nearly all of the RFG fuel contains the controversial MTBE (15% of RFG fuel) and several states are phasing it out with the result that alcohols (Ethanol, Methanol, Isopropanol) or ethers are taking it's place.
Some of the important issues for Porsche owners are:
1 Gasoline over 6 months old is junk, especially without added fuel stabilizer
2 Gasoline Octane can be important for perfomance as the latest Motronic FI will detune the engine if Octane is too low.
3 Once minimum Octane is achieved higher Octane does not help performance or fuel economy. Regular fuel has the same energy per gallon as premium. But so called convential fuels have a few percent more energy content per gallon than RFG fuels. High Octane fuel merely resists combustion by compression. Higher Octane is achieved by using slightly more expensive components like so called Alylate and Reformate named after refinery processes.
4 Some refiners make fuel that exceeds the rated (pump) Octane (can be highly variable i.e. batch dependent).
5 Additives are important especially to preserve the fuel and to prevent corrosion on cars used infrequently
6 Racing fuels can improve power but remember that engines were designed for a particular fuel. A Formula 1 engine is designed together with the allowable fuel. I don't have much experience with racing fuel, but would strongly suggest you don't try to mix your own.
7 As far as brands go, I think that most of the majors like Exxon/Mobil, Shell, Chevron etc. will make a very consistent and precise gasoline with good additives, it's hard to tell who is best this week. There is a lot of fuel swapping in the distribution system but usually additives will stay brand specific. Watch out for water in the gas especially at the onset of Winter or during cold snaps, and avoid filling up when the delivery truck is re-filling the station.
For further reading try:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part1/
Great post rrys
One question: 95 or 98 oct on a 996? (european octane units that it)
I always used 98 octane but often wondered if there is a difference in real life as to performace, milage, engine life....
rrys , great info. Is it also true that all the different gas companies in one region fill up at the same refinery and just dump in some of their " brand" of additives as the only way to differentiate them ? I heard that here in the Bay Area , most if not all the companies use base gas stock refined at Tosco in Benecia .
Would you happen to know which refiners have some of that " more octane than listed " base stock ?
Carlos/RJ,
Both European and US refineries measure RON (Research Octane Number) and MON (Motor Octane Number) the same way i.e. by using a pair of specialized single cylinder Waukesha engines, one for RON and one for MON. In the US we post the "Road Octane(R+M)/2 at the pumps i.e. Premium is typically 93 Road Octane (also called CLC or AKI (Anti Knock Index)). In Europe they post the RON on the pumps and premium is 98 Research Octane. Typcially, but not always, the RON is about 10 higher than the MON. The RON correlates best to knocking under mild city driving and MON correlates best to high load highway driving. Originally there was only the RON number. I've heard it was the Germans in the late 60's that insisted on an alternate octane measure as they were blowing up engines on the Autobahn even with the proper RON. When the MON test came out it seems the US took the compromise approach to post the Road Octane, but the Europeans including the Germans stuck with the RON posting. European tradition? It would be much better if the complete specifications for the fuel were posted at the pump (RON, MON, ROAD, Reid Vapor Pressure, Oxygenate type, Sulfur, MMT amount, Aromatics.....) as I think that Porsche owners would be most interested in high MON values and owners of older cars might be interested in other compatibility issues.
Porsche (my manuals) indicate there is no problems with ethanol or MTBE but does not seem too keen on the Octane Enhancer MMT. Lead (Tetra Ethyl Lead can have an Octane of 10,000 for the first drop) will wreck your catalyst and O2 sensors and simply cannot be used. We've all heard of the various racing fuels (some are closer to chemical explosives) in dragsters etc. like NitroMethane, Nitrous Oxide, Methane, Propylene Oxide, Aviation Gas, and various other racing fuels. While some of these fuels can destroy engines there seems to be a very large number of firms that make racing fuels and many racing fuels are made by the major Oil companies for NASCAR and various other race circuits for example. I'd guess these might have some improvement in a stock Porsche, but are not that likely to be very cost effective. Just search for "racing gasoline" in Goggle and you will find lots of suppliers.
I was working with a number of enthusiasts in the UK recently, and they swear by Shell Isomax Gas. I find it interesting that the Porsche Shop Manuals recommend fuel filter change interval of 60,000 miles and the O2 sensors (4 of them) seem to be good for more than 100,000 miles as they don't even show up in the maintenance schedule.
Hey I guess with so little required maintenance we need to drive more. I would however be curious to hear any observations on racing fuel in a stock 996 engine.
I am also in the SF Bay Area. There are 2 refineries. All gas comes from the same pipe. The only difference is the additive package that is squirted in depending on the brand. Jeff
Just poking fun at Citgo name recognition.
rrys, great discussion. What is Shell Isomax fuel? Does this refer to the refining process and demetallization?
I understand that Techron may be a leading additive.
Chevron Techron
rrys,
thank you for taking the trouble with your detailed replies on the forum. I've been using the Shell Optimax every second or third fill. The car seems to pull more cleanly but the overall consumption is unchanged at about 23 miles/imperial gallon.
Great post ryss. Much appreciated. I use Shell Otptimax gere in the UK 98 RON. I notice the car "feels better" when driving.......don't know if that's a psychological thing though.
Peter B......aright wack
rrys, Thanks for the information and link. I've always wonders about such things. Just can't seem to find the time to research all the wonders I seek answers for.
A few years back I worked on the development of a software package called BOSS (Blend Optimization and Supervisory System). Thats where I picked up a lot of this info.
When they make gasoline it is usually made batchwise in a large (maybe 100,000 barrel) tank. 6 to 12 Blend components like MTBE, various naphthas, Alkylate, Reformate, Butane, various additives... are mixed in a pipe and the product gasoline tank is filled over a period of 8-20 hours or so. The gasoline in the pipe is continuously analyzed by dozens of analyzers as it fills the tank. The BOSS software adjusts the formulation while filling based on the analyzers and the grade being made. The tank is then mixed for a day and sampled to make sure all the specs are met (i.e. certified for shipment). Octane is only one of maybe 25 specifications that need to be met. In some cases the cheapest way to make a particular batch of gasoline is to overproduce the RON or MON, but as refineries shift crude oils and other operating parameters it is hard to tell which gas station might have some free Octane. FYI Tosco in Martinez (but not Benecia), CA uses the BOSS software.
This software is running in dozens of refineries around the world and it helps the refineries to meet all the complicated rules for making reformulated gas in an economical manner. Rules by CARB (California Air Resource Board) in CA, EPA regs in the US, and similar rules in Europe.
Reformulation started with the Clean Air Amendment in 1990. The EPA had measured the air pollution in every city in the US and the Clean Air Act went after one of the easiest ways to clean up the dirty air. Make the gasoline burn cleaner by reformulation. I.e. politically easier than taxing fuel or banning cars or going after other sources of pollution. It has worked to improve air quality somewhat, and more reformulation changes are being phased in over the next few years but there still is a lot of air that is considered unhealthy and reformulation alone doesn't fix the air pollution problem as there are other sources than cars. One item they are going after now is the vapors and spills during fueling. You may see some new charcoal cannisters to collect the vapors on the car side. Apparently the refiners wanted to put the collection device on the vehicle and the Auto manufactures wanted to put it in the Gas Station. The refiners won that one.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.