fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

stock alignment specs

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHstock alignment specs

Leading reported evidence

Replace m030 springs/shocks

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I replaced the M030 springs/shocks with PSS9's and asked my mechanic to put in as much negative front camber as the suspension would allow without buying camber plates or slotting the strut towers.

Original post Read captured discussion
stock alignment specs
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace m030 springs/shocks' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace m030 springs/shocks' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace m030 springs/shocks

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I replaced the M030 springs/shocks with PSS9's and asked my mechanic to put in as much negative front camber as the suspension would allow without buying camber plates or slotting the strut towers.

Original post Read captured discussion
stock alignment specs
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

for a '99 996 C2 coupe? i feel as though i could really benefit from about a degree more negative camber in the front. car really does have that factory street "push" initially. will be tracking the car all year next year, was wondering what the range was for alignment adjustments on stock suspension components. Robert

POST 2Original post

Max -0.6 negative camber for my 2000 996. Some cars will get less. I put in PSS-9 and have it lowered to close to European ride height and I get -1.5 camber.

POST 4Original post

Eric: You get -1.5 camber up front in a stock 996? Kam

POST 5Original post

Kam, It's not quite stock. I replaced the M030 springs/shocks with PSS9's and asked my mechanic to put in as much negative front camber as the suspension would allow without buying camber plates or slotting the strut towers. It really helped take away much of the initial understeer that I was suffering on the track. I tried 7mm front spacers and also helped, but I eventually took them out as I didn't like the way the steering felt.

POST 6Original post

Eric: Cool! I thought you got a special 996!! I have the same setup you have and got -1.5. Kam

POST 7Original post

when you say -ve camber... how does that work? do the wheels point closer to eachother in a -ve camber setup (i.e. in an imaginary triangle formation) or do they point away from eachother forming the imaginary point of the triangle behind the front wheels?

POST 8Original post

This is how negative camber looks like from either front or rear: / \

POST 9Original post

ok... I get it now.... so a little -ve camber in the front will make the car handle better? what about in the rear is -ve camber desired there as well without affecting high speed stability? while we are on the subject what is caster? thanks /P

POST 10Original post

Some light reading: http://www.ozebiz.com.au/racetech/theory/align.html Gives a bit of an overview...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.