fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

trump magazine...got taste!

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHtrump magazine...got taste!

Leading reported evidence

Use p..before interior mods where completed

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I photographed the opening image for the story using my P..before interior mods where completed, which is to bad, but aI focused the shoot on the model to hide the fact that I am not a car photographer.

Original post Read captured discussion
trump magazine...got taste!
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use p..before interior mods where completed' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use p..before interior mods where completed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use p..before interior mods where completed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I photographed the opening image for the story using my P..before interior mods where completed, which is to bad, but aI focused the shoot on the model to hide the fact that I am not a car photographer.

Original post Read captured discussion
trump magazine...got taste!
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

No not off topic...trump magazine has a nice editorial write up about the "no subsitute" car...the Porsche!! I photographed the opening image for the story using my P..before interior mods where completed, which is to bad, but aI focused the shoot on the model to hide the fact that I am not a car photographer. Anyway it is nice to see that other than car mags pay attention to a legendary brand! http://www.trumpworldmag.com I'll post the full image and first title page later,,,have to scan them!

POST 3Original post

Props for the fashion, beauty, body and commerical work - absolutely outstanding Shot the glamourous ladies myself for 3 years back in the UK - Had to seach hard for a shot that I could publish here without issues ! But, fun as it was, it caused way to many marital issues... So now I live in the US, shoot motorsports, and I'm happily married! Chris.

POST 5Original post

$20 subscription for a whopping 4 issues? WTF???

POST 6Original post

Gotta pay for the excellent photography! Chris.

POST 8Original post

That's really awesome, I'm going to look for it, thanks.

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

heee Dell I thought you were in the money?? I never buy the issue...but had to this time...because they are to cheap to mail them for free...they got to pay me for the usage of the image!!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.