11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHYour thoughts on salavage cars?
Leading reported evidence
Check frame
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I took a good hard look at where they sectioned the roof and checked the frame for pulls.
Leading evidence: 'Check frame' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check frame' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Porsche inspected the car and had no issues with it - so that's an interesting perspective.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Plus tracking a car that has not been properly repaired sounds dangerous.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Something about not having a "clean" title, this might only apply in the state of California.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would agree, with the exception that if you want to use this for non-standard use, track (depending on how bad it was to start with and how well it has been repaired), AX or rallycross.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would agree, with the exception that if you want to use this for non-standard use, track (depending on how bad it was to start with and how well it has been repaired), AX or rallycross.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would agree, with the exception that if you want to use this for non-standard use, track (depending on how bad it was to start with and how well it has been repaired), AX or rallycross.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was wondering what people thought about buying salavge cars? The damage looks light (fender, hood, headlight) with no frame damage. However, the fact is the car is still a salvage title car. Worth it for $10K off? Would it be hard to resell when it comes time?
Stay away. Even if it's had an accident, or major paintwork, the resale price will be grossly affected. A totalled, flooded, or otherwise salvaged Porsche is close to worthless. These are not Honda's. They are automobiles that are perfectly balanced and engineered down to the very last precise detail.
The whole symbiatic relationship between you, the car, and the pavement are all destroyd, once the car has been comprimised.
Damn! arr0gant that was intense! haha. Yeah I definitley would NOT purchase a salvaged vehicle. Not even a honda! I believe you can't get proper auto insurance on a car that has been salvaged, either that or a auto loan. Something about not having a "clean" title, this might only apply in the state of California. If you're getting an auto loan for the car saving the $10,000 which is about $170 a month is not worth it! My water bill is more than that! So you gotta take it in perspective.
I would agree, with the exception that if you want to use this for non-standard use, track (depending on how bad it was to start with and how well it has been repaired), AX or rallycross. I'd use the term "track pig", but I really don't like to use that term on a Porsche.
I would stay away from flood vehicles at all costs as future electronic and rust problems could be a never ending night mare.
However, vehicel that have had moderate collision damage or theft recoveries would be fine with me, IF the price was appropriately reduced.
My Father in law bought a used Chevy Shortbed pickup 1 year old that had a rebuilt title. I tracked the history and got a copy of the estimate that totaled it and discovered it was a light rollover. I took a good hard look at where they sectioned the roof and checked the frame for pulls. He bought it about 10% below wholesale, drove it 3 years and sold it to a friend who has had it 5 years now.
Just because a vehicle has been damaged doesnt mean it can't be properly repaired. But be infirmed on what the damage and repair was.
Likewise, there are many theft losses with that are delcared a total loss because it isn't recovered in a week and the owner is paid for the loss of the car. Then it shows up a few weeks later with minor items removed and the ins company has to sell it at auction. Again, I would want an appropriate discount but i sould be OK with owning that car.
Any rebuilt car I would only buy if I intended to keep it 4 or more years as resale will be difficult.
What he said ^
You want your 1st 911 experience to be as clean and pure as it can possibly be.
While all the others comments have their points, I'll refer back to my original. Under mostly all situations (99.5%), when buying your 1st 911, don't cut corners. A salvaged/questionable car, under any circumstances, is no way to start your Porsche owning experience.
GOOD LUCK, and keep the questions coming!!
Now IM GOIN OUT TO DRIVE MY PERFECT CAR!!!
Gant
For a savings of $10k off the purchase price, you can easily pay much more than that in repair costs. Plus tracking a car that has not been properly repaired sounds dangerous. As the others have correctly stated, your patience will be rewarded if you delay your purchase until winter.
If its a salvage becuase of theft then I would have no trouble cutting it up and turning it into a proper racer, but for a street car that your going to have to resell at some point, spend the money and get a clean one.
There is someone on the BMW board that bought a flood 850i that has never and I mean never ever ran at any point after he towed it home for auction.
My buddy here in SoCal did a great job on a 98 Boxster with salvage title.
Rebuilt it by hand, to his (exacting) standards, and it's a sweet ride.
He knows it'll always be an issue when it comes time to sell, but he accepted that going in.
Of course he was very picky about the car in the first place, and he knows his **** when it comes to rebuilding cars - so in the end it's not quite as cut and dried as some folks here would have you think.
It's a personal choice - given full disclosure and a full understanding of the consequences.
As a side note - when the engine failed on this 98, out of warranty but still low mileage - Porsche still replaced it FOC (after a suitable struggle), even though it was salvage title.
Porsche paid for the block, owner paid labor. Porsche inspected the car and had no issues with it - so that's an interesting perspective.
Chris.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.