6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBack in a 996 after 10 years :)
Reported or suspected cause
making sure it's
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'making sure it's' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'making sure it's' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check process myself' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
But I checked the process myself and then with broker to make sure they knew what they were doing.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Back in 2000 I had a 996 aero car, then a 2001 before I swapped to a 997S in 06'
Been tossing around getting a Porsche after driving a heavily modified 2006 Lotus Exige for the last few years. Turning 40 so it would be nice to get into a Porsche for my back lol, so after speaking to my mother "Who also has a 996 Cab" up in Canada she is going to sell it to her son for a steal because she never uses it.
Spec's
2000 996 Cab, Black Full leather, Slate Grey, Tip, Hard top ..Only 15,000 one owner miles!!!
I added the squatted version of the folded taco rear wing from Champion and Gt3 side skirts. The car needs a cool front bumper.. Suggestions? I am thinking 996GT3 style the match the side and rear side skirts. It has sport design wheels already so I am thinking upgrade the Coilovers, Wheels Spacers and done!
My other issue is if she "Gifts" me the car, has anyone attempted to bring a Canadian car into the US? Could be tricky.. I live in FL. Planned to drive it down
Ill get some pics up.
Sweet!
Have brought a few cars from the US into Canada and it's not too difficult - most painful is the 6% duty plus the taxes. Probably less costly going the other way.
Good luck.
The only probelm with gifting is you will pay tax on actual market value. Its better to just put down a value you will be comfortable with (preferably less then market value).
Just brought a C4s in from Montreal. PM for info. Biggest issue is making sure it's to US spec. EPA and DOT. If originally US car it should have stickers. If not you'll need letters plus probably more to do this. I brought back a car that was originally a US car. So not sure the headaches of not a US car.
I also used a broker. So maybe it wasn't me who did the paperwork. But I checked the process myself and then with broker to make sure they knew what they were doing.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
