fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

MY 99 996 vs MY 00 996

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHMY 99 996 vs MY 00 996

Reported or suspected cause

good reason the thread starter

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

There's probably a good reason the thread starter from 20 years ago was banned

Original post Read captured discussion
MY 99 996 vs MY 00 996
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'good reason the thread starter' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'good reason the thread starter' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

good reason the thread starter

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

There's probably a good reason the thread starter from 20 years ago was banned

Original post Read captured discussion
MY 99 996 vs MY 00 996
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

The MY99 996 has a mechanical throttle and the MY00 996 has a fly by wire throttle. I have a 99 and i have noticed that when revving the motor at a stop, there is a slight delay in the response of the motor when i depress the throttle, probably half a second or so...is this normal...can it be adjusted?

POST 2Original post

I had a 99 and also had the same problem as you. the delay does not come from the pedal, it's the cable between the pedal and throttle that is not tight enough. It's pretty easy to fix BUT if you have it too tight, the car will be very unsmooth.... Hope this helps JM

POST 4Original post

That's curious; how does the cable cause the delay? What's the fix? .B ekiM

POST 5Original post

The immediate and momentary "bog" you feel when snapping the throttle in the 99 is due to the sudden in-rush of fuel without a corresponding in-rush of air. With the electronic throttle on the newer car, it actually opens the throttle -first- then eases on the fuel injection instead of going full-open all at once. It all happens 1/2 to 3/4 of a second. Almost all manual throttle cars have a quick bog when snapping the throttle from a stop. If it were an old carbeurated car, it would likely cut out completely rather than a quick bog. Greg

POST 6Original post

So, according to this thread, maybe the analog accelerator cable versus the e-throttle is not as good as everyone makes it out to be. Thoughts? I couldn't resist. Bring back a very old, the oldest thread #1. can you say bump.

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 17052879

Why did you do this? This makes no sense......If I was a Mod I would abyss this thread and you would get a 30 day vacation....

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 17052879

Analog accelerator cable is superior. There's probably a good reason the thread starter from 20 years ago was banned

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.