fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

996 & 997 rated most reliable 6 to 11 yr old cars - Magazine Autotest

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 & 997 rated most reliable 6 to 11 yr old cars - Magazine Autotest

Leading reported evidence

Test of cars 6

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Porsche 996 and 997 again voted the most reliable in 2015 test of cars 6 to 11 years of age.

996 & 997 rated most reliable 6 to 11 yr old cars - Magazine Autotest
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test of cars 6' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test of cars 6' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test of cars 6

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Porsche 996 and 997 again voted the most reliable in 2015 test of cars 6 to 11 years of age.

996 & 997 rated most reliable 6 to 11 yr old cars - Magazine Autotest
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Something I saw on the 996 Facebook group which this forum would appreciate: Porsche 996 and 997 again voted the most reliable in 2015 test of cars 6 to 11 years of age. (Magazine Autotest) see attachments.

POST 3Original post

But what about the IMSB?? (kidding! very nice to see, thanks for sharing!)

POST 4Original post

On a related note Porsche is still at the top in JD Powers ranking as well... I'm sure though these types of articles falls on deaf ears around here to the majority since peeps here are all about doom and gloom...

POST 6Original post

Specifically it says that an 11-year -old 911 is generally in better condition when tested than a 3year old Dacia Logan (the lowest priced car on the market there). It goes on to say that is due not just to the quality of the car but also the maintenance and care it receives, implying that a Porsche receives more than a Dacia which should be obvious. They're sort of damning it with faint praise there but then again, I assume the average Ferrari owner isn't skimping on maintenance either...

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 12401425

[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:] https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/603x279/verbal5_8a2dea3c819ca4224ee58d33028d0ba88763edda.jpg

POST 8Original post

Would someone please message them and let them know the truth. We can't have real data interfering with perception

POST 9Original post

Hmmm. . . it's written in German and if you look closely at the names in the left margin, I think the authors' names are "M. Muller, T. Edig and W. Hatz".

POST 10Original post

I don't speaking German, but isn't that #1 for IMS failures?

POST 12Original post

Undoubtably lack of speed limit on the autoban is a major factor.

POST 13Original post

Most owners never go on a Porsche forum and don't hear or worry about anything, they just drive the car, and most of them go for years without any major problems. Am I wrong about this or do some of you agree?

POST 15Original post

Quotes source post: 12405588

I'm sure you are right. Unfortunately not my experience. I would have totally agreed with the reliability post if it was for the 986.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.