17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHQuestion about ECU flash
Reported or suspected cause
more of a gateway drug
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
It turned out to be more of a gateway drug for other intake and exhaust mods.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd be reluctant to recommend the flash to anyone who wasn't going to do a bunch of other stuff, too, whereas I think it's just about mandatory if you are.
Leading evidence: 'more of a gateway drug' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'more of a gateway drug' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend flash' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used Softtronic on a Boxster I had several years ago.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd be reluctant to recommend the flash to anyone who wasn't going to do a bunch of other stuff, too, whereas I think it's just about mandatory if you are.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Anyone running a Softronic flash, I would like some feedback.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I've just recognized that my stock Carrera (and Boxster) has far more power than I will ever use 99.9999% of the time.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Recommend flash
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd be reluctant to recommend the flash to anyone who wasn't going to do a bunch of other stuff, too, whereas I think it's just about mandatory if you are.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All:
I am seriously considering an ECU flash as part of this summers mods. Anyone out there done it? Thoughts on Softronic (they are somewhat local), verses GIAC or Evoms. Evoms is pricer(est?), does that mean better? Locally, in my hood, there is F1 Tuning, don't really know much about them. Anyone running a Softronic flash, I would like some feedback. Thankx, in advance,
R\
Scott
I had it done a while ago. Candidly, lower end and about town driving, it's largely unnoticeable. However, when you really get up on the car, you can feel the press higher mid to high revs. Is it worth the money? Then again, I could say the same about my plenum, wheel spacers, exhaust, etc. What else are you going to do with it?
I have Farnbacher Loles customs flash done twice. I have Fabspeed headers, exhaust and EVO intake. First flash is without an aftermarket headers map and second with. The difference is night and day after the second flash. The first map flash(no after market headers) was not as different compared with original; just better throttle response. The drives to Hershey with Marc's 3.6L and Redridge's SC 3.4L proved that it holds its own. I also have the nighest mileage on the cars at 95K.
My recommendation is to get all the better airflow hardware mounted before the flash and talk to several tuners. Basically, I think my timing was advanced a bit more on my second map. It would be even more aggressive if I had 200 cell cats installed but it would have excessive noise/droning issues. I have read that Fister hack and 200 cell cats combo do not drone.
by myself on the street, Cant tell the diffrence... but when im at the Back Straight of Mosport International Raceway, i have the upper hand on a Stock C4S, im definatly catching up and passing the Stock Car... I do have Headers, Cat-Pipes, Mufflers and Air-Box, i think all this works great together
I used Softtronic on a Boxster I had several years ago. 95% of the time I didn't notice a difference. And that 5% -- hard to know if it was a real or placebo effect. That said, I did not do any of the supplementary mods expect for a new Dansk exhaust, so I could not get the full benefit effect of the Flash.
This is in no way meant to discousrge anyone from using a Flash product. I certainly don't dispute the data. I've just recognized that my stock Carrera (and Boxster) has far more power than I will ever use 99.9999% of the time. If I were to track my car, I'd likely think differently.
if you consider a flash - put on 200 cell cats and BMC oiled filter into stock airbox.
All any ECU flash really does is an effort to reduce margin of emissions compliance to gain a little bit of power/torque increase offered by increased airflow.
So it is important to have this 'increased' airflow as if it did not change - flash will not be able to do much.
also it increases output heat a bit and reduces sensitivity of O2 sensors so you will not get CELs
I vote softronic as it is easiest one to do and all those flashes do pretty much same stuff no matter from whom you buy it for your stock motor. totally custom race-style tuned GT3 engine flash for particular exhaust type is a different animal.
here is link to my pre-post tune dyno graph. ignore those absolute numbers - look how shape of power/torque line got changed - that is what you do it for, not for that hypothetical '40 horses plus' gain.
Revo here. Honestly, I noticed a difference at first and then quickly became used to it. It turned out to be more of a gateway drug for other intake and exhaust mods. I'd be reluctant to recommend the flash to anyone who wasn't going to do a bunch of other stuff, too, whereas I think it's just about mandatory if you are.
The Turbo that I bought has a Softronic flash. The car is very very VERY fast. I didn't drive a Turbo before I bought mine, but if you watch the boost on the dash, and you're pushing past .8 bar of boost, you are into the flash area. Scott at Softronic was easy to talk to, and was helpful (after I jostled him a bit.) They don't like talking to people who bought their tune second hand (bought a car that was tuned.)
Scott said that his tune takes into account exhaust changes, so if you buy the tune, and then get a different exhaust, he says that it accommodates the difference. These cars are so damned fast, I have to question why one needs a tuned chip. On the other hand, there is nothing like pushing down on launch control (the throttle) and having to hold onto the wheel for dear life as the car leaps forward. And it does LUNGE forward.
Enjoy.
larry
Wow:
excellent info guys! I wasn't really planning to do much in the way of engines mods...just a flash for some increased torque/power, especially, when I want the extra push at the track........I will re-think this proposition and may hold off for a bit. Thankx for the all the great feedback!
R\
Scott
FWIW, two long time Porsche techs, both friends of mine and one a customer whose hot rod Buell motor I built told me that they can't tell any difference on a N/A car. If there is, and some of their customers claim they can tell, some have a hard time, the difference is hardly discernable. Now they both said there is a huge difference on the Turbos. I have felt a chipped Turbo and the diff is day and night.
No first hand experience, but it's hard to see where a bit more spark advance or fuel would make a difference. I think the stock ECU will give all the advance you can safey use at any given rpm for the octane of fuel, and any more fuel will only make the mixture too fat decreasing preformance, a bit leaner and internal heat will start climbing. With a freer flowing exhaust, I'd think the MAF would sence it and kick more fuel to the injectors.??? don't know, just speculating
