20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 REVIEW!
Leading reported evidence
Replace bearing as soon as possible
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I believe the best advice is if the 996 car you're considering is still on the original factory bearing or has a retrofit bearing that is well beyond the service interval, then make plans to replace the bearing as soon as possible.
Leading evidence: 'Replace bearing as soon as possible' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace bearing as soon as possible' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So I do understand your point on replacing the bearing either way, and you may be right.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace bearing as soon as possible
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I believe the best advice is if the 996 car you're considering is still on the original factory bearing or has a retrofit bearing that is well beyond the service interval, then make plans to replace the bearing as soon as possible.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi fellow 996 enthusiasts! Here is something for you, that I think you'll enjoy! I hang out in the 997 forum these days but I have always loved my 2003 996 - it's the closest water cooled 911 to the air cooled originals! If you enjoy, please LIKE and SUBSCRIBE. Thank you and have a great weekend!
You Tube
Nothing is the value that it was a year and a half ago, but the 996 is still the most 911 for the money! And the closest water cooled to the original air cooled models in concept and execution.
As others have said, Well done.
You spoke about the 996 in ways only a 996 owner can. Our cars are not perfect, you pointed out the short comings while staying positive throughout.
If I didn't already own a 996, you could probably sell me one!
Enjoyed it Thomas! I good overall review of the 996. Very clear and concise message.
But since this is a technical forum, I have one point of disagreement.
You state at 16:30, "
Odds are if the car you're looking at hasn't had a [IMS] failure by now and is still on the original bearing, your car will likely NOT suffer from the problem
"
Even if you don't agree with the merits of the
Eisen, et al. v. Porsche Cars North America
class action lawsuit, I don't believe it's good advice to tell potential buyers "the IMS bearing in these cars won't likely suffer from the problem if it has happened yet".
I believe the best advice is if the 996 car you're considering is still on the original factory bearing or has a retrofit bearing that is well beyond the service interval, then make plans to replace the bearing as soon as possible. Ignoring that advice could potentially bankrupt the car if a failure occurs and takes out the engine. That may sound like fear-mongering, but IMHO, it's good practical advice for anyone thinking about buying these cars.
Again, good job and thank you for sharing.
Thank you David. Change is never easy, especially in the world of Porsche. When it was introduced, even I had a hard time accepting the new longer, lower and wider shape, especially since it was much less curvy on the sides. But once I got over the idea of change, and judged the car on it's own merits, I realized what a special car the 996 truly is. Since the 996, no other 911 has been as close to the original concept and stayed as true to providing that magic 911 experience. I now have a 997 GTS and while I love it and it dominates on track, my 2003 996 was far more enjoyable for every day driving on the street. It was lighter, sounded better and did exactly what you want from a Porsche! Thank you for watching!
Thank you for watching
@b3freak
, and thank you for your comments! I actually do agree with the lawsuit, and wish Porsche had stood behind the M96 and M97 engines the way Porsche buyers would expect of the company. It is inexcusable to find that you have a potentially catastrophic defect and not take care of it. Having said that, I believe the statistics both in the lawsuit and over time, have demonstrated that as a percentage of cars built, a relatively small percentage actually will fail. Yes, that is still a large number in light of the total volume of engines built. And we have all seen examples of failures, even with aftermarket bearings. Nobody can predict with certainty, and having been in the auto business and worked for companies including Toyota, Mazda a a couple very exclusive European performance brands (not Porsche) I can tell you every car made has problems including Toyota and Honda. You have to take the bad with the good. So I do understand your point on replacing the bearing either way, and you may be right. I did in fact replace mine around 45,000 just for peace of mind, but I'm not sure it was necessary. Fortunately I never had to find out! Sincerely, thank you for watching, and I appreciate your feedback!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
