22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDrove a 997 today, but prefer my 996
Leading reported evidence
Replace 996
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I am now going back to 2007, but I test drove the 997 TT before I purchased it to replace my 996 .
Leading evidence: 'Replace 996' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace 996' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So today, just for kicks, I thought I'd test drive a 2008 997 Turbo.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I am now going back to 2007, but I test drove the 997 TT before I purchased it to replace my 996 .
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Hated the fried egg head lights and the interior is simply cheap looking using lots of inferior plastics.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I own a 2001 996 Turbo. I've been wondering if I'd ever want to "trade up" to a 997 someday. So today, just for kicks, I thought I'd test drive a 2008 997 Turbo.
The 997 is worth about $25,000 more than my car. On paper, it should be faster, doing 0-60 in about half a second faster than my car. Maybe it's because the 997 was a tiptronic, or because my 996 has a modified exhaust, but I came away feeling like my 996 was faster. At any rate, my car just felt more fun, and is certainly way more bang for the buck.
So, happily, I feel no need to "trade up" to a 997! I feel like I'd be paying a lot more money for a car that doesn't feel any faster. Also I'm not a huge fan of the 997's busier dashboard.
I'll probably try another 997 someday. Maybe a manual with a louder exhaust will be more to my liking.
Maybe it is because your 996 is lighter.......
The trend seems to be that the newer the car, the more it weighs. Not always the case but it seems the REALLY new cars are losing a little weight.
At top speed, your car probably has a lower coefficient of drag, also.
I don't know what the numbers are for the turbos but for the Carreras the Cd was .30, one of the lowest Porsche ever accomplished on a production car, as far as I know. At least for the 'modern' cars.....
Everyone has their own driving preferences but I personally can't think of one parameter of performance where the 997 is not noticeably superior. I owned both, still have the 997 and prefer it in every way. Hated the fried egg head lights and the interior is simply cheap looking using lots of inferior plastics. Great for you that you preferred your car since you saved yourself a chunk of money.
Mine are not turbos so performance is not at the same level but if I had to choose between my 2011 997.2 or my 2002 996, I honestly don't know which one I'd pick. Yeah, I like the 997 headlights better than the 996 but that's a small detail to me. My WB C4S is otherwise a very beautiful car to my eye. Anyhow, they are different cars and both dear to me but how can you choose one child over the other??
You are not comparing apples to apples. The real comparison would be a 997.2 4S compared to your 996 4S. I am quite certain you would no longer be in doubt. BTW- the 996 4S does have a beautiful shape. Far nicer than a 997 C2, except for the headlights of course.
I prefer the "Fried Eggs" (with their racing heritage background) to something that looks like it come off a VW Beetle...
you know what they say about opinions...
Gaining power at about the same rate as weight, and always faster. Add the much improved interior and round headlights, and the 997 is a winner every time.
All specs from Excellence tests:
2002 C2:
Curb weight - 2,959
HP - 320
Torque - 273
0-60 - 5.0
2005 C2
Curb weight -3,075
HP - 325
Torque - 273
0-60 - 4.8
2005 C2S
Curb weight - 3,131
HP - 355
Torque - 295
0-60 - 4.6
2010 C2S
Curb weight - 3,208
HP - 385
Torque - 310
0-60 - 4.5
I'm holding out to afford a 2010-11 C2S with the DFI engine. That said, I love my 996.
The 996 is superior to every 993 based on that same logic. And there are lots of people who actually think the 993 is a better car. I don't, but that's another story. The reality is that it is all just an opinion. This post was about how he likes the 996 better and you tell him he is wrong.
You post sounded to me like you were trying to justify your purchase.
Sorry
I saw a black 997 on the interstate today, I wasn't driving my 996 so he was probably wondering why I was staring.. I love how wide they look, and the front end is sweet, but I wouldn't go into debt for one...
I am now going back to 2007, but I test drove the 997 TT before I purchased it to replace my 996 . It is only after I drove it did I decide to purchase it. I have no need to justify anything.
I may be an outlier but when I was looking I drove a 997 c4 and several 996c4s and I prefer the look and feel of the 996
Both are wide bodied..... Both nice cars... And yes... The 997 has a more upscale interior.... I just prefer the look of the 996
Its like the more sensuous look of Cindy Crawford vs the hotness of Heidi Klum
Both are amazing Lookers.... But I prefer the Cindy Crawford look.
Myself...I'm aiming for the 3some between Cindy and Heidi . I hope to be adding a 997 GT3 in a few yrs but would keep my 996 C4S which I don't plan on ever selling unless something unforseen forces me to. It's one of the most beautiful cars I've ever owned, if not THE . It looks like it's sculpted out of a chunk of steel. ...
I agree completely. Having owned a 996 and a 997, there are things that I like about both of them. They are different, but both great in their own way.
I feel just the opposite. I like the TIP just fine, it doesn't matter to me which trans it has to me but I been driving sticks for 58 years, I've gotten lazy and I like it.