23 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBittersweet Day yesterday...
Leading reported evidence
Replace rms, ims and clutch
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My RMS, IMS and clutch were replaced 10 months ago and it seems the RMS is leaking again.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What you are doing here is replacing a slightly leaking seal, and because everything is apart now you are obligated to replace a bunch of other expensive parts too that haven�t reached their end of service life yet.
Leading evidence: 'Replace rms, ims and clutch' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace bunch of other expensive parts too' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
It was replaced three times in the first 140,000 miles.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
997 part number was used, assume it's the latest part available.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What you are doing here is replacing a slightly leaking seal, and because everything is apart now you are obligated to replace a bunch of other expensive parts too that haven�t reached their end of service life yet.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What do you guys think, labor wise, how many hours is it to just drop the transmission and replace the RMS?
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace bunch of other expensive parts too
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What you are doing here is replacing a slightly leaking seal, and because everything is apart now you are obligated to replace a bunch of other expensive parts too that haven�t reached their end of service life yet.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What you are doing here is replacing a slightly leaking seal, and because everything is apart now you are obligated to replace a bunch of other expensive parts too that haven�t reached their end of service life yet.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
23 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
Fixed it for you for the next time you need service.
Took the car to the dealer for the 40,000 mile service. She was running great, as always, and figured it would be routine.....Until the call came.
Rear main seal leaking.
Wellllllll....while you're back there, how about a new IMS bearing! Ok! Oh...and might as well do the clutch too.
Peace of mind does not come cheap, but I'm glad I joined the party. Best case scenario, really on IMS replacement...
How bad is it leaking. Thought they all did that
my new one started again after 12k. If not dripping bad wait till the clutch really needs replacment then tackle them all.
My RMS leaked on my 996 almost the entire time that I owned it. It was replaced three times in the first 140,000 miles. It never left spots on the garage floor, but it did "sweat" oil, as my mechanic called it.
I saw it with my own eyes....it was pretty wet back there. That being said, I think I have only added a grand total of a half quart of oil ever to the engine. It didn't add up to me, really.
It was pretty cool to see the engine bay from underneath with the tranny out of it. I asked soooooooo many questions and have a much better working knowledge of what we all have back there. It all lookedfairly simple back there....mechanical, compared to all the doo-dads on the S6 I had before. Now I won't go so far as to say the knowledge gained was worth the price of admission, but it was a nice 20 minute discussion with the mechanic!
ForumRunner_20150114_100815.png
I got the service records for my car (first 30k mi. or so) from Park Place and it had three RMS visits and a couple of changes.
Guess they got it right the last time...
TC
P.S.--Ditto on the AOS. IMS/clutch/AOS/RMS should be a package deal. (Then, something else will break!
)
My RMS, IMS and clutch were replaced 10 months ago and it seems the RMS is leaking again. Maybe 1-2 little drops of oil every couple of days but enough to bother me obviously. Based on old service records (have all of them), RMS was first replaced after couple of years of ownership and there are several mentions about it by the dealer every so often when the car was serviced. My concern is that it will never get fixed and I just throw good money at it...
What do you guys think, labor wise, how many hours is it to just drop the transmission and replace the RMS?
thanks
If your car was fitted with the new-style RMS and is still leaking, I wouldn't throw money at the problem until you have some other reason to have the car in for service. I know there are some here who feel that any oil leak is unacceptable. If you're looking to sell the car or the leak concerns you, you should probably take another run at the RMS.
I'm guessing your mechanic will charge you 50% of the labor you paid for the RMS/IMS/clutch job you did recently.
If this was my car, and I was certain the RMS was the source of the leak, I'd just slide a sheet of cardboard under the car and spend the money on other stuff that needs fixing or leave it in the bank.
Someone smarter than me can chime in - but if the updated RMS leaks, the issue may be with the case rather than the seal. If this is true for you, no number of RMS replacements will stop your car from seeping oil...
Dropping the transmission may not be something that weekend warriors feel comfortable with. It's easy to get a clutch wrong - and if you get in over your head and wind up bedding the car to the shop along with a frunk full of parts, the reaming you get goes to another level entirely.
997 part number was used, assume it's the latest part available. Previous owner had all of it done.
that's my understanding as well that if the tolerances are off, no new RMS will ever fix it.
Unless it�s a major leak, I would leave the seal alone until something else comes up (clutch, AOS) that warrants a transmission pull. Pretty much all used engines leak oil (on every car out there regardless of make), even if it leaks enough to leave a drop or two in the ground, as long as it�s manageable, leave it alone. What you are doing here is replacing a slightly leaking seal, and because everything is apart now you are obligated to replace a bunch of other expensive parts too that haven�t reached their end of service life yet. If it�s not too lake, leave it alone.
Well, it was done at the dealership. The leaky RMS was discovered during the 40,000 mile service and that was gonna be $1400. When everything hit the fan, I said this is a good opportunity to just get it allllllll done, so I did. Out the door for $4400 including tax...but that means I got the IMS bearing, Rear seal and clutch for $3k....which from a dealer seems low
We have a local street where this is more like $20.
BTW you 06 Aero looks freaking awesome!
To the OP good decision to do all while your there.
Alp,,,,??? You out there? See what your missing?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.