26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew pics of my C4S
Leading reported evidence
Run 15mm
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'm running 15mm on 295/30 but was curious about yours.
Leading evidence: 'Run 15mm' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean car, and nice shots' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Now that I've set my standard on the big butt, I can't have anything less
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey guys, just wanted to share some new pics I took of my C4S from yesterday. The car will be going up for sale soon and these will be the pics for the ad. In case anyone would like to see the high res pics, here is the link to my album:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dgatan...7644870887705/
Gorgeous. What year ?
Question, what size rear spacers are on your car ? Also what rear tire size are your running ?
My C4S black black also with Sport Technos like you have...list 17mm spacers but were AWOL when I bought it. I'm running 15mm on 295/30 but was curious about yours.
Ragin--beautiful machine. My friend is in the market for a 996. Can you shoot me a message when you get ready to sell? He likes the SoCal cars.
Tim C.
[email removed]
Thanks Seeeu911, its an 03 and the rear tires are 295/30/18. Not sure off hand the size of the spacer, I bought the car a year ago and it came with the Technos already installed. I will check for you when I get home this evening.
Just a little over a year, bought it in March 2013. This is my first P-Car and I got so anxious to buy it, but later kicked myself for not buying the Turbo hehe
Thanks Adcampo, the handling has improved greatly. Less roll, feels firm. Only draw back is it is stiffer thus you feel a little more of the road bumps. Overall, I am very satisfied
Agreed! I always wanted a P-Car but never considered a 996 until I came across an ad for a C4S and was in awe. Now that I've set my standard on the big butt, I can't have anything less
