13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHReprogram my key
Leading reported evidence
Check there just in case
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check there just in case' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check there just in case' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Good luck with that! Those ipass codes are kept in the same safe as the Coca Cola recipe. haha
Seriously, you need to make a trip to your closest Porsche dealership.
I think you may be thinking about the unique bar code associated with the keyfob transmitter and necessary for authentication and programming but are not the ipass codes. The ipass codes are supplied by the dealership via the PIWIS. Am I missing something here? That's the way they explained it to me at the dealership when I had new keys made.
You need Porsche dealership, keys, car, proof of ownership. They are the only ones that can do it. They have to call either PCNA (probably not much help there) or Porsche in Stuttgart.
Quick...get a AAA membership with free towing. Seriously, something is out of whack if both keys don't work. Sorry, dealership only, there is no other way.
Walk out to the garage and feel the carpet/foam padding behind and under the drivers seat. If it is damp, That's your problem !!
You will need a new immobilizer, and the IPAS code. Yes the Dealer or a Porsche Authorized/Certified Locksmith only have access to IPAS codes.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
