fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Won?t go into reverse

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWon?t go into reverse

Leading reported evidence

Use zip ties

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

In the picture you�ll see they�re using zip ties which are supposed to solve them working loose(I have some but placed differently).

Original post Read captured discussion
Won?t go into reverse
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use zip ties' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use zip ties' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use zip ties

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

In the picture you�ll see they�re using zip ties which are supposed to solve them working loose(I have some but placed differently).

Original post Read captured discussion
Won?t go into reverse
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

Zip ties solved the issue, thanks for the replies

Original post Read captured discussion

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

NEARBY ACTION · LINK UNVERIFIED

In the picture you�ll see they�re using zip ties which are supposed to solve them working loose(I have some but placed differently).

Nearby source post

Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I finally got my 996 running again after installing a new clutch. Everything felt great until I tried reverse. It won�t go into reverse at all. I hooked up the shift linkage, I guess it could have wiggled loose . What all could cause this?

POST 2Original post

Recheck the shifter cable linkage on the transmission. When you recheck it for proper operation, have someone shift so you can observe the operation of the cables and linkage under the car.

POST 4Original post

To be really specific; the cables tend not to want to seat as well in these spots in this picture link below and in my experience when they slip loose reverse is really affected and hard to get into. In the picture you�ll see they�re using zip ties which are supposed to solve them working loose(I have some but placed differently). https://cdn4.pelicanparts.com/techar...mall/pic28.jpg

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Zip ties solved the issue, thanks for the replies

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.