9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHImagine a "Wassergek?hlt" show...
Leading reported evidence
Run parallel
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Or just another "Porsche" event that we could run parallel with?
Leading evidence: 'Run parallel' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run parallel' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've been looking at all the draw-dropping gorgeous photos from Luft 6 this week and started wondering, what would it look like someone put together a show like that for the water cooled cars - a
Wassergek�hlt show.
Which water cooled cars would make the cut? I can think of a couple I'd like to see:
The original Boxster concept
Credit:
https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-cul...f-the-boxster/
The GT1 (with 996 Mk1 fried egg headlights!)
What other Porsches would you want to see? I think that ground rules would have to be cars that are significant because the factory only made a limited number or are uniquely and tastefully customized. And of course, no air-cooled engines.
Wanna buy one? This belongs to an acquaintance. It's legally on the road in Canada, and would be old enough to import to the states relatively easily. 50k CAD is like high 30's USD today.
https://www.facebook.com/marketplace...5513715649750/
I really like the way you are thinking on this. I don't know of any event targeted at the water cooled community. And we need one. You made a good start with defining the Boxster prototype as the start of our era and we should go from there.
Does anyone know of an existing, smaller event we could all get behind and support? Or just another "Porsche" event that we could run parallel with?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
