27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHad my Window Label recreated
Leading reported evidence
Use (called "gimp")
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The font is specific to the photo editing software I used (called "GIMP").
Leading evidence: 'Use (called "gimp")' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'only dealer)' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check off my list' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
To make it look more authentic you shouldn't abbreviate "Package" Besides mine , I had several reference window Labels from others here I used before to validate it, and no where did it say PKG.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used Monroneylabels.com its not even close to the same service.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
thanks, I have the carfax when I bought the car, shows it was original registered and titled in Salt Lake City UT, so I'll assume it was bought at Salt Lake City Porsche (back in 98 it was likely the only dealer)
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Just one of those things I needed to check off my list.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
To make it look more authentic you shouldn't abbreviate "Package" Besides mine , I had several reference window Labels from others here I used before to validate it, and no where did it say PKG.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
only dealer)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
thanks, I have the carfax when I bought the car, shows it was original registered and titled in Salt Lake City UT, so I'll assume it was bought at Salt Lake City Porsche (back in 98 it was likely the only dealer)
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Thanks Chris, Great Job, I need to get it and COA framed with some pictures..
Only piece of documentation that I was missing .
Every maintenance receipt back to warranty, rest on file with selling dealer.
reproduction of original
http://www.stuttgartstudios.com/
Both images: iPhone 6s
Lightroom
I used Monroneylabels.com its not even close to the same service. Op has a digitally accurate recreation. The monroneylabels had some misinformation
(I used it twice) and the way it prints out would have zero use to a collector or enthusiast imho.
I created a DIY window sticker a few years back. I think the links still work. Have a look if you want to try doing it yourself.
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...w-sticker.html
I have my window sticker, but it was folded up in the owners manual for years and the ink bled through.
I just filled out the getting started and uploaded a copy of my original sticker.
Would be nice to have a good quality copy (and maybe a laminated one too) if the price is affordable.
Glad I could 'get er done' for you, Mike! It was a pleasure. +996 for the Deviated Carpet, not a common option. Will be doing a full web site redesign in the next month or two thats also a bit more mobile friendly. Stay tuned.
Chris, SS
To make it look more authentic you shouldn't abbreviate "Package" Besides mine , I had several reference window Labels from others here I used before to validate it, and no where did it say PKG.
Also in Standard Equipment, you list 18" wheels and Tires, I see you have 18 " Wheel options but the standard was 17" . You list Porsche Stability Management System, It's just Porsche Stability Management just as it is on the button.
The "Soft Look" leather sounds like it was from a option decoder description, On multiple labels I've look at it's listed as "Supple Leather Front and Rear"
I think you meant to list Total Price not Privce
I'm not sure what Font you picked but Italic Font Spacing seems pretty tight in header description.
Just trying to help,
Mike
thanks, I have the carfax when I bought the car, shows it was original registered and titled in Salt Lake City UT, so I'll assume it was bought at Salt Lake City Porsche (back in 98 it was likely the only dealer)
My point being Mine was delivered new, but sticker showed original Dealer had it commissioned in another state. If you don't have any confirming info I'd go with your gut.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
