20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNeed Advice, which to buy?
Leading reported evidence
Check compression and everything
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I will check for compression and everything before buying anyway.
Leading evidence: 'Check compression and everything' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check compression and everything' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would however check the vins with porsche dealer to make sure/check for all recall etcs was performed.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would however check the vins with porsche dealer to make sure/check for all recall etcs was performed.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Adding to this, many owners of ultra low mileage cars don't pay much attention to maintenance, especially oil changes and ESPECIALLY the first oil change following delivery.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Adding to this, many owners of ultra low mileage cars don't pay much attention to maintenance, especially oil changes and ESPECIALLY the first oil change following delivery.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey mates, I am about to purchase a 911, I have 2 choices:
1999 Black on Black, aero package, nice rims,
21000 miles
Or
2001 Still black on black, no aero, 57000 miles
Which one should I got for? and Why?
Do 99's have more problems than 01's?
Both of them original miles and engines.
I would avoid the 99, but not for the reason you think. IMHO, it doesn't have enough miles on it. At just over 2500 miles a year, that poor thing has spent a lot of time sitting around. These cars don't seem to like that.
Yes, 99s are reputed to have more problems than later cars, but that wouldn't factor into my decision. Mileage really would.
Yup, mileage too low. I agree it's bad for any car, and for all kinds of reasons ranging from engine seals to exhaust systems. Adding to this, many owners of ultra low mileage cars don't pay much attention to maintenance, especially oil changes and ESPECIALLY the first oil change following delivery.
In my humble opinion, the dream pre-owned 996 would have accumulated at least 5,000 miles a year, with complete service records back to delivery. The ones that are pretty but lack mileage and history are like girls: they can break your heart.
Hah, both owners have maintained them correctly and have all the history, if not, i wouldn't even be posting them here. What i figured is to change exhaust and seal right away, since it costs me almost nothing since I have people for the job. I will check for compression and everything before buying anyway.
J, the price on the 99 is a tad lower. Options are the same.
I'm always a fan of buy the newest you can....but the lower mileage, while it may be an issue...may not end up being an issue at all. Tough decision. As far as I know, there are no significant differences on the appearance. If it were an '02...I'd say grab that one....but it's not.
If you plan on driving the car A LOT...then go for the '99. That way, you can still retain a car and sell it without hitting 100K on it. Much easier to sell.
J
thats what i thought J, and being a car dealer, i know the importance of low mileage.
Im gonna have to go with my gut, and see what the compression tests results are.
thanks guys
Good luck, and I truly hope you enjoy the car. I still think, respectfully, that you're nuts to consider such a garage queen, but you might win the toss. Hope so!
Raty - I have a 2004 Lapis Blue C2 that is for sale. 42k miles (a.k.a. NOT a Garage Queen), asking price was $52,000, reduced price $50,500. Here is a link to the particulars:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showpost...19&postcount=1
I prefer lower mileage cars, easpecially with aero pkg....5k dollar option. - my 99 had only 21k when I bought in in Feb 07. I have been very pleased with my purchase so far. I would however check the vins with porsche dealer to make sure/check for all recall etcs was performed. And you can see for yourself what maint was done. I will be shot for this by many here but my 99 is on original RMS rear mainseal and no issues. I think this is luck of the draw, as well as how you warm the car up before driving it,(my opinion)at least for me. I will tell you - all 996/997 are higher maint cars....and crap does fail like MAFS and the occassional water leakage issues
I recently sold my 2000 996 and it had 15,870 miles on it when I sold it. I bought it in Sept, 2004 with 8,250 miles on it. Absolutely no problems or RMS leaks ever!
I just wanted to put a post in this thread to show that low mileage is not always bad. Our 996 went approx 2-3k miles per year, every year. I think what truly harms the car is if it is not driven AT ALL for an extended period of time...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.