13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCorrect colors I hope
Leading reported evidence
Run these pictures thru photoshop or some other program
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Are you running these pictures thru Photoshop or some other program?
Leading evidence: 'Run these pictures thru photoshop or some other program' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run these pictures thru photoshop or some other program' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd shoot in JPEG fine, makeing sure everything in my processing chain was set to use the "sRGB" color space.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T070717Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I don't understand what it is you're doing. Are you running these pictures thru Photoshop or some other program? I've seen cameras in cellphones that do a better job of reproducing the true color. The colors are still off....that is not an exact reproduction of Guard's red. The picture shown in thread #5 is the closest to the right shade. It shouldn't be this difficult to get the right color in a photograph.
He's playing with some pretty high-powered, professional level hardware and software, if I remember correctly.. A Canon EOS-5D in RAW mode, Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop. That kind of set up gives you tremendous flexibility in processing but also many opportunities to screw things up.. nothing against the original poster, but unless you're doing semi-pro work or really know what you're doing you can dork up colors pretty easily.
RAW mode is working with the "unprocessed" pixel information as it comes off the camera sensor. Digital camera purists swear by it because it does the least amount of processing "in camera" and therefore gives you the most information, and greatest flexibility, to post process later. But unless you really need it, it's a waste.
I'd shoot in JPEG fine, makeing sure everything in my processing chain was set to use the "sRGB" color space. Then save for web as the final step in Photoshop as the final step.. That should give a reasonable expectation that the colors will be similiar for everyone, although without getting into a true colormatched workspace there's no way to guarantee that -- your monitor could be set up completely different than mine.
- Nick
