17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNot happy with my V1 location
Reported or suspected cause
only factor
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Visibility between your seats for rear facting detection is probably the only factor to really worry about.
Leading evidence: 'only factor' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'only factor' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
so i have V1 mounted up by the rear view mirror. a few things make feel weird:
1) radar not it the line of sight of the road. basically means i have to look up to see it
2) when i am blinded by the sun and bring the visor down, i can't see what the radar says
so i think my options at this point are:
1) mount it right below the rear view mirror
2) mount it right above the dash
my question to anybody who done it - how do you wire it up in case of 1) so that the power wire is hidden from the view? double-sided tape? also i assume i can tuck the wire behind the dash in case of 2) - right?
For 1) I think the best you can do is to loop the wire around the arm on the back side of the mirror once or twice to keep it fairly taut between the mirror and headliner, which won't be in your view. When I don't have my V1 mounted, that's what I do with the loose wire, don't notice it since it's behind the rear view mirror from me.
2) no idea for sure, but I would think you could do it that way. But IMHO that's not a good mounting point since you want higher for greater sensitivity.
How about option 3) getting the remote display? Will allow you to keep a higher mounting point, but find a flexible display location.
I have an '04 Boxster I bought new. While I was having the CD changer installed at the dealer (part of the initial sale), I had them hard wire my V1 to the right of the rear view mirror and put the remote on the top of the steering column.
Works great for me. With the remote attached, the main unit does not light up at all (which may be why the State cop didn't pull me over after I passed 4 cars last night, but that's a different story
). With no light to give its existence away, you get a lttle stealth. Also, you can put the right visor down to make it completely undetectable from the rear.
My remote isn't actually mounted. I could velcro it there but I only have the velcro applied to the unit, not the steering column. It just "floats" but doesn't move at all.
You also risk loosing laser detection by mounting the unit so high on the car.
Officers will target high contrast areas on the vehicle with the lidar, namely the front plate (if you have one) or the headlights.
Mounting the V1 high gives you a greater chance that the detector will not 'see' the laser, aimed much lower on the vehicle.
Even Valentine state
The supposed difference in RADAR sensitivity at lower positioning points is questionable science at best.
Unlike the tight beam of the LASER, the RADAR scatters all over the place, so mounting high or low is unlikely to make any difference.
Visibility between your seats for rear facting detection is probably the only factor to really worry about.
I mount my detector central and low to maximise both LASER and RADAR detection, with very effective results.
As you can see here:
This keeps it in line of sight for faster reaction to potential threat alerts, without the need for additional remote displays or wiring in the car.
I have detected and avoided tickets from both RADAR and LASER speed traps using this method.
Check out this website
RADAR BUSTERS
for more details on low mounting your detector for best results.
Chris.
ahh much better... rewired V1 to have it sit about 3 inches above the dash. one thing is kind of driving me crazy: the wire that runs behind the dash (next to the windshield) doens't seem to go all the way in no matter how much i push it in. any suggestions on making it stay down? i can see it a stick out a little when i look close.
That makes sense, but I suppose the question is whether we are trying to detect when we are being lasered, as opposed to picking up laser reflections/scatter coming off of cars in front. For the latter, Valentine's website seems to suggest higher mounting so the detector has greater forward visibility.
If I mount the detector lower, I get a higher likelihood of knowing that I have been lasered - but at that point isn't it too late?
with laser its always too late. unlike radio waves, laser doesn't reflect/scatter - which is what makes it so hard (if not impossible) to detect ahead of time.
i think you mis-read valentine's website - they mean "greater visibility" for X/K/Ka but not laser.
LASER is not useless - here's a real example from my experience
Heading North out of Vegas in the Boxster, long straight road that passed through a 2 horse town.
Noted as I came into town, that the speed limit was way low - tempted to speed through as the road was straight and I could see for miles.
Slowed anyway, crusied through at speed limit.
As I approached the next speed sign at the far edge of the town, I was tempted to accelerate early and hard and zip off down the road.
Just as I hit the gas, my LASER detector went crazy!
Backed off straight away.
Got hit again in seconds - I still can't see the cops, but I'm keeping below the speed limit......
As I pass an old barn on the right, there they are - cops in their cruiser, with the LASER pointed down the road.
The detector saved me a ticket for sure - I would have been doing 90 by the time I passed them!
So leave it on - it can save you for sure.
Chris.
i just got one of my two v1's upgraded to the POP software. funny thing is, i'm reading a lot about disabling it....so far it hasn't caused issues (that i know of).
this site has some interesting things...
http://www.radardetector.net/viewforum.php?f=23
I like my Valentine mounted like cdodkin's photo but would like to 'hard wire' it. Anybody know where to find a wire to tap into? Really tough on these 'computer cars'.... jVm
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.