fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Not happy with my V1 location

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNot happy with my V1 location

Reported or suspected cause

only factor

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Visibility between your seats for rear facting detection is probably the only factor to really worry about.

Not happy with my V1 location
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'only factor' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'only factor' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 17 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

only factor

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Visibility between your seats for rear facting detection is probably the only factor to really worry about.

Not happy with my V1 location
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

so i have V1 mounted up by the rear view mirror. a few things make feel weird: 1) radar not it the line of sight of the road. basically means i have to look up to see it 2) when i am blinded by the sun and bring the visor down, i can't see what the radar says so i think my options at this point are: 1) mount it right below the rear view mirror 2) mount it right above the dash my question to anybody who done it - how do you wire it up in case of 1) so that the power wire is hidden from the view? double-sided tape? also i assume i can tuck the wire behind the dash in case of 2) - right?

POST 2Original post

You should buy the optional remote display and mount it on the top of the steering column.

POST 3Original post

For 1) I think the best you can do is to loop the wire around the arm on the back side of the mirror once or twice to keep it fairly taut between the mirror and headliner, which won't be in your view. When I don't have my V1 mounted, that's what I do with the loose wire, don't notice it since it's behind the rear view mirror from me. 2) no idea for sure, but I would think you could do it that way. But IMHO that's not a good mounting point since you want higher for greater sensitivity. How about option 3) getting the remote display? Will allow you to keep a higher mounting point, but find a flexible display location.

POST 4Original post

I use option 1, and the wire length is sufficiently short and behind the mirror not to annoy me.

POST 5Original post

I have an '04 Boxster I bought new. While I was having the CD changer installed at the dealer (part of the initial sale), I had them hard wire my V1 to the right of the rear view mirror and put the remote on the top of the steering column. Works great for me. With the remote attached, the main unit does not light up at all (which may be why the State cop didn't pull me over after I passed 4 cars last night, but that's a different story ). With no light to give its existence away, you get a lttle stealth. Also, you can put the right visor down to make it completely undetectable from the rear. My remote isn't actually mounted. I could velcro it there but I only have the velcro applied to the unit, not the steering column. It just "floats" but doesn't move at all.

POST 6Original post

Ditto. I have it mounted here in front of the warning lights and works great.

POST 7Original post

You also risk loosing laser detection by mounting the unit so high on the car. Officers will target high contrast areas on the vehicle with the lidar, namely the front plate (if you have one) or the headlights. Mounting the V1 high gives you a greater chance that the detector will not 'see' the laser, aimed much lower on the vehicle. Even Valentine state The supposed difference in RADAR sensitivity at lower positioning points is questionable science at best. Unlike the tight beam of the LASER, the RADAR scatters all over the place, so mounting high or low is unlikely to make any difference. Visibility between your seats for rear facting detection is probably the only factor to really worry about. I mount my detector central and low to maximise both LASER and RADAR detection, with very effective results. As you can see here: This keeps it in line of sight for faster reaction to potential threat alerts, without the need for additional remote displays or wiring in the car. I have detected and avoided tickets from both RADAR and LASER speed traps using this method. Check out this website RADAR BUSTERS for more details on low mounting your detector for best results. Chris.

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

ahh much better... rewired V1 to have it sit about 3 inches above the dash. one thing is kind of driving me crazy: the wire that runs behind the dash (next to the windshield) doens't seem to go all the way in no matter how much i push it in. any suggestions on making it stay down? i can see it a stick out a little when i look close.

POST 9Original post

That makes sense, but I suppose the question is whether we are trying to detect when we are being lasered, as opposed to picking up laser reflections/scatter coming off of cars in front. For the latter, Valentine's website seems to suggest higher mounting so the detector has greater forward visibility. If I mount the detector lower, I get a higher likelihood of knowing that I have been lasered - but at that point isn't it too late?

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

with laser its always too late. unlike radio waves, laser doesn't reflect/scatter - which is what makes it so hard (if not impossible) to detect ahead of time. i think you mis-read valentine's website - they mean "greater visibility" for X/K/Ka but not laser.

POST 11Original post

A laser signal just gives you advance warning that you just got a ticket, but the cop hasn't put it in your hand yet. Speed detection is immediate.

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

yup, exactly. i am actually thinking of turning Laser off. its useless and falses every once a while.

POST 13Original post

LASER is not useless - here's a real example from my experience Heading North out of Vegas in the Boxster, long straight road that passed through a 2 horse town. Noted as I came into town, that the speed limit was way low - tempted to speed through as the road was straight and I could see for miles. Slowed anyway, crusied through at speed limit. As I approached the next speed sign at the far edge of the town, I was tempted to accelerate early and hard and zip off down the road. Just as I hit the gas, my LASER detector went crazy! Backed off straight away. Got hit again in seconds - I still can't see the cops, but I'm keeping below the speed limit...... As I pass an old barn on the right, there they are - cops in their cruiser, with the LASER pointed down the road. The detector saved me a ticket for sure - I would have been doing 90 by the time I passed them! So leave it on - it can save you for sure. Chris.

POST 14Original post

I have 2 V-1 units. One in the Porsche, the other in my SUV. I bought mine before the POP 2 feature. Do you think it's worth upgrading to POP 2?

POST 15Original post

i just got one of my two v1's upgraded to the POP software. funny thing is, i'm reading a lot about disabling it....so far it hasn't caused issues (that i know of). this site has some interesting things... http://www.radardetector.net/viewforum.php?f=23

POST 17Original post

I like my Valentine mounted like cdodkin's photo but would like to 'hard wire' it. Anybody know where to find a wire to tap into? Really tough on these 'computer cars'.... jVm

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.