Rennlist

What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWhat would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Leading reported evidence

Use 9 inch fronts and 11 rears

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use 9 inch fronts and 11 rears on my track C2 so it can be done.
Original post Read captured discussion
What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Frequently discussed work

Run 11s

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
You can run 11s on a narrow body?
Original post Read captured discussion
What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use 9 inch fronts and 11 rears' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 11s' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Run 11s

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
You can run 11s on a narrow body?
Original post Read captured discussion
What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Run 305s it makes sense

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
If this is a track car and you want to run 305s it makes sense to put 11s on back.
Original post Read captured discussion
What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run 11s

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
You can run 11s on a narrow body?
Original post Read captured discussion
What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Run 305s it makes sense

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
If this is a track car and you want to run 305s it makes sense to put 11s on back.
Original post Read captured discussion
What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Use 9 inch fronts and 11 rears

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use 9 inch fronts and 11 rears on my track C2 so it can be done.
Original post Read captured discussion
What would be the correct offset for 8.5's and 11's?

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T150039Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hello, Can you please tell me what the correct offset would be for 8.5" fronts and 11" rears for a '02 996? Thank you

POST 2Original post

i'm curious to know what the offset would be as well, especially if i put on the PSS9 if i can even have the wheel spacer adapters at all

POST 3Original post

You can run 11s on a narrow body?

POST 4Original post

Sounds like you want the '04 GT3 wheels which have an ofset of 40 for the front and 63 for the rear.

POST 5Original post

I use 9 inch fronts and 11 rears on my track C2 so it can be done. Mine are packed away for the winter so I can't tell you what the offsets are but I will tell you that they need to be exact. There is no room to spare on either the inside or out. My car is pretty low but I'm sure it will be just as tight at street height. If this is a track car and you want to run 305s it makes sense to put 11s on back. If it's a street car, I think you would be much happier with 10 or 10.5. Just my 2 cents worth.

POST 6Original post

The '04 GT3 wheels (8,5x18 ET40 & 11x18 ET63) will work on a '02 without any problems.

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thank you for the help guys!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.